Skip to main content
  • Original Articles
  • Published:

In vitro Activity of Monoclonal and Recombinant Yeast Killer Toxin-like Antibodies Against Antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive Cocci

Abstract

Background

Monoclonal (mAbKT) and recombinant single-chain (scFvKT) anti-idiotypic antibodies were produced to represent the internal image of a yeast killer toxin (KT) characterized by a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity, including Gram-positive cocci. Pathogenic eukaryotic and prokaryotic microorganisms, such as Candida albicans, Pneumocystis carinii, and a multidrug-resistant strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, presenting specific, although yet undefined, KT-cell wall receptors (KTR), have proven to be killed in vitro by mAbKT and scFvKT. mAbKT and scFvKT exert a therapeutic effect in vivo in experimental models of candidiasis and pneumocystosis by mimicking the functional activity of protective antibodies naturally produced in humans against KTR of infecting microorganisms. The swelling tide of concern over increasing bacterial resistance to antibiotic drugs gives the impetus to develop new therapeutic compounds against microbial threat. Thus, the in vitro bactericidal activity of mAbKT and scFvKT against gram-positive, drug-resistant cocci of major epidemiologial interest was investigated.

Materials and Methods

mAbKT and scFvKT generated by hybridoma and DNA recombinant technology from the spleen lymphocytes of mice immunized with a KT-neutralizing monoclonal antibody (mAb KT4) were used in a conventional colony forming unit (CFU) assay to determine, from a qualitative point of view, their bactericidal activity against Staphylococcus aureus, S. haemolyticus, Enterococcus faecalis, E. faecium, and Streptococcus pneumoniae strains. These bacterial strains are characterized by different patterns of resistance to antibiotics, including methicillin, vancomycin, and penicillin.

Results

According to the experimental conditions adopted, no bacterial isolate proved to be resistant to the activity of mAbKT and scFvKT.

Conclusions

scFvKT exerted a microbicidal activity against multidrug resistant bacteria, which may represent the basis for the drug modeling of new antibiotics with broad antibacterial spectra to tackle the emergence of microbial resistance.

Introduction

The spread of bacterial resistance to antibiotics has become a major public health problem over the past decade (13). The growing concern about the future of antibacterial chemotherapy has led to fears of a return to a pre-antibiotic era (4). Resistance control strategies must involve concerted efforts by patients, physicians, the pharmaceutical industry, and the public health community (1). The ensuing years unavoidably will be characterized by strict guidelines for prescriptions and the clinical use of antibiotics, as well as severe restrictions on their use in agriculture, fish farms, and animal husbandry (1,2,5). It is, nevertheless, difficult to anticipate to what extent prudent use of antibiotics will really affect the resistant bacteria already present in human and environmental reservoirs. Recent studies suggest that a reduction in the use of antibiotics might be unsuccessful at reversing the high levels of antibiotic resistance currently found in hospitals and communities (6,7). Therefore, the development, not only of new conventional antibiotics, but also of novel compounds and alternative strategies for the battle against bacterial infections is becoming a topical and widely recognized need.

In recent years, we produced antibodies with antibiotic activity in polyclonal, monoclonal, and single-chain recombinant formats. These antibodies bear the internal image of a yeast killer toxin (KT) produced by a selected strain of Pichia anomala and characterized by a wide spectrum of antimicrobial activity, including against Gram-positive bacteria, but with a yet undetermined mechanism of action (813). In the related Williopsis mrakii killer system, HM-1 killer toxin kills susceptible strains, presumably through interference with the synthesis of the cell wall β-1,3-ghican (14).

Like KT, monoclonal (mAbKT) and/or single-chain recombinant (scFvKT) KT-like antibodies were proven to kill Candida albicans, Pneumocystis carinii and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis cells in vitro. They were also therapeutic in experimental models of candidiasis and pneumocystosis (1216). Although the opsonophagogytic activity monoclonal antibodies in vivo cannot be disregarded, the even more potent therapeutic effect of mAbKT and scFvKT attests to their intrinsic antibiotic activity. mAbKT and scFvKT were shown to be equivalent functionally to animal and human protective antibodies elicited in serum or vaginal fluid by an undetermined, yet specific, KT receptor (KTR) of sensitive microorganisms involved in experimental and natural infections (17).

In this report we present, from a qualitative point of view, the in vitro activity of mAbKT and scFvKT against several Gram-positive cocci with different antibiotic resistance patterns, including methicillin-resistant and borderline-susceptible staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant enterococci, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci. This study offers a rationale to design new antibiotics with broad antimicrobial spectra against current drug-resistant bacteria.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains

The bacterial strains used in this study and their relevant antibiotic susceptibilities are presented in Table 1. All were clinical isolates, except for Staphylococcus aureus LS1-R and S. haemolyticus 221–4, which were stable teicoplanin-resistant clones obtained in population studies from heterogeneously teicoplanin-susceptible clinical isolates (methicillin-resistant the former and methicillin-susceptible the latter). Staphylococcus aureus a3 and a53 were two borderline methicillin-susceptible isolates. Staphylococcus aureus a38 and CVC4 were two methicillin-resistant isolates, the latter with reduced susceptibility to teicoplanin. Staphylococcus haemolyticus 7086, SH8, and 615 were teicoplanin-resistant isolates (SH8 and 615 were also methicillin-resistant). Enterococcus faecium LS10 and E. faecalis 2724 were two highly vancomycin- and teicoplanin-resistant VanA isolates. Streptococcus pneumoniae strains 5353 and 143 were penicillin-resistant; whereas, strain 153 was penicillin-intermediate.

Table 1 Bacterial test strains and their antibiotic susceptibilities

mAbKT

The immunoglobulin M (IgM) KT-like mAb (mAb K10) used throughout this study was produced according to a previously described procedure (12). The hybridoma secreting mAb K10 was obtained by the fusion of myeloma cells IA983F and the spleen lymphocytes of rats immunized with the KT-neutralizing mAb KT4 (18). The hybridoma cells were grown in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) with 15% fetal calf serum (Sigma). mAb K10 was purified from culture supernatants by precipitation with ammonium sulfate and dialysis against phosphate-buffered saline (PBS).

scFvKT

KT-like scFv (H6) used throughout this study was produced according to the procedure previously described by using the commercial Recombinant Phage Antibody System (Pharmacia Biotech AB, Uppsala, Sweden) (13).

Briefly, mRNA from spleen lymphocytes of mice immunized with the KT-neutralizing mAb KT4 was reverse-transcribed and a scFv antibody library was constructed by cloning the relative antibody genes into a specific phagemid vector. Recombinant phages, produced in a transformed Escherichia coli strain (TG1), were repeatedly panned against mAb KT4 and screened by a conventional ELISA against the same mAb. The selected recombinant phages were used to infect a nonsuppressor E. coli HB2151 strain to produce soluble recombinant scFv that were purified by affinity chromatography using an anti-E Tag N-hydroxysuccinimide activated Sepharose column (Pharmacia Biotech AB).

In vitro Bacterial Killing Assay

The qualitative killing assay against the bacterial isolates investigated in this study was carried out by using mAbKT against all of the bacterial isolates studied, and scFvKT against four representative bacterial strains (E. faecium LS10, E. faecalis 2724, S. aureus a38, and S. pneumoniae 5353) in a conventional colony forming unit (CFU) assay. Bacterial isolates were grown on Mueller Hinton agar or 10% horse blood agar plates at 37°C for 24 hr. Bacterial cells from isolated colonies were suspended in saline to an optical density of 0.5 McFarland and then diluted in Mueller Hinton broth (1:1000 Enterococcus isolates, 1:500 S. haemolyticus isolates, 1:2000 S. aureus isolates, and 1:1000 S. pneumoniae isolates, respectively). 10 µl of this suspension, containing approximately 2–3 × 103 viable bacterial cells, were added with 100 µg of purified mAb K10 or 10 µg of purified scFv H6 in a total volume of 100 µl. For S. pneumoniae isolates, 1% Supplement B (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI) also was added. All the bacterial suspensions were incubated for 5 hr at 37°C. As controls, in the in vitro experiments of antimicrobial activity, we used an irrelevant, isotype-matched, commercially available mAb (ABPC 22; Sigma Chemical Co.) and an irrelevant scFv anti-idiotypic antibody (antiId) previously described (19). As a further control, a similar inoculum of bacterial cells was also added to mAbKT or scFvKT preincubated overnight at 4°C with 100 µg of mAb KT4. After incubation with the respective reagents, the bacterial cells were dispensed in Petri dishes and covered with molten Mueller Hinton agar that was allowed to solidify. The plates were then incubated at 37°C and observed after 48 hr for bacterial CFU enumeration. Each experiment was performed in triplicate and the results were calculated as a mean. In one circumstance, the CFU assay was also carried out by plating 10 µl of bacterial cell suspensions (S. aureus a38) after incubation with scFv H6 and appropriate controls for 24 hr.

Results

The bactericidal activity of mAb K10 and scFv H6 against the antibiotic-resistant Grampositive cocci qualitatively investigated in this study is presented in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. The results are expressed as % inhibition, compared with the appropriate control. The bactericidal activity of mAbKT and scFvKT was significantly neutralized by mAb KT4 (data not shown). Figure 1 shows the appearance of the killing and neutralization assay against a representative bacterial isolate (S. aureus a38) after 24 hr of incubation with scFv H6 and appropriate controls. Notably, the bacterial colonies surviving the activity of mAbKT and scFvKT should not be considered as resistant, since they behaved just as sensitively when tested in another CFU assay performed under the same experimental conditions (data not shown).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Effect of single chain fragment variable yeast killer toxin-like recombinant anti-idiotypic (antiId) antibodies (scFvKT) on the growth of Staphylococcus aureus a38 cells in a colony forming unit (CFU) assay.

Standardized bacterial inocula treated with: scFvKT H6 (top); irrelevant scFv antiIds (lower left); scFvKT H6 neutralized with mAb KT4 (lower right).

Table 2 Antibacterial antibiotic activity of mAb K10
Table 3 Antibacterial antibiotic activity of scFv H6

Discussion

Among antibiotic-resistant bacteria, Gram-positive cocci have become predominant over the past two decades for their ability of acquiring resistance. This is followed by the horizontal transfer of resistance genes and the clonal expansion and spread of resistant clones (2,20). Notable examples are methicillin-resistant staphylococci and vancomycin-resistant enterococci among nosocomial pathogens, and penicillin-resistant pneumococci among community-acquired pathogens. Most methicillin-resistant staphylococci are insensitive to many other conventional antibiotics, thereby requiring the use of glycopeptide antibiotics. Unfortunately, vancomycin treatment failures have been reported in infections caused by methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus (2223), S. haemolyticus (24,25), and S. epidermidis (26), with decreased heterogeneous susceptibility to glycopeptides. Borderline methicillin-susceptible (or borderline-resistant) S. aureus strains have been associated with widespread nosocomial infections (27). Vancomycin-resistant enterococci, which have become major nosocomial pathogens, particularly in the U.S.A. (28,29), are often resistant to multiple antibiotics and have been regarded as a classical example of the impact of antimicrobial drug resistance on therapeutic options (30). Moreover, vancomycin resistance can pass from enterococci to other pathogens. Natural spread has been reported among enterococci (32) and other Grampositive bacteria (3234).

In pneumococci, once among the most highly penicillin-susceptible bacteria, penicillin resistance is now a global problem. Further concern with penicillin-resistant pneumococci currently arises from their increasing resistance to other antimicrobial agents, including third-generation cephalosporins and macrolides (19,35), and from the emergence of tolerance to a number of bactericidal antibiotics, including vancomycin, β-lactams, aminoglycosides, and quinolones (36). Against such increasingly antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive cocci, antimicrobial research, which until recently has been ahead of the resistance race, must increase its committment for the search of innovative antibiotics. However, continuous modification of conventional drugs seems unlikely to succeed in the long-term fight against bacteria.

Natural short-chain peptides produced by a number of animals as defence mechanisms have been under study for their broad spectrum of antimicrobial action (3739). Natural antibiotic peptides usually act by damaging the bacterial cell membrane, but regretfully, they can also damage mammalian cells. In our studies, we demonstrated that monoclonal and recombinant anti-idiotypic antibodies, bearing the internal image of a yeast killer toxin recognized to be active against Gram-positive cocci, may be therapeutic in experimental models of candidiasis and pneumocystosis without the induction of toxic effects (13,16). Even though the mechanism of action is still undetermined and currently under study, it is argued, from the immunofluorescence studies, that it can rely on the interaction with an uncharacterized trans-phyletic cell wall KTR shared by taxonomically unrelated microorganisms. This speculation is corroborated by the findings of functionally equivalent and therapeutic human natural anti-KTR killer antibodies in individuals undergoing repeated infections with KTR-bearing microorganisms (17).

The finding of the microbicidal activity of monoclonal and recombinant KT-like antibodies, which had proven to be killing in vitro and/or in vivo C. albicans, P. carinii, and MDR M. tuberculosis (1216), against drug-resistant staphylococci, enterococci, and pneumococci make engineered antibody derivatives particularly attractive as therapeutic agents for currently untreatable microbial infections. It is noteworthy that smaller scFv H6 displayed at lower concentrations an antibacterial activity similar to that of higher molecular sized IgM mAb K10 and that prolonged incubation with microbicidal antibodies may result in a remarkable increase in the rate of killing. The determined sequence of the variable region of the heavy and light chains of scFvKT should make possible the engineering of new molecules characterized by an unexhausted mechanism of antibiotic activity.

References

  1. Kunin CM. (1993) Resistance to antimicrobial drugs—a worldwide calamity. Ann. Int. Med. 118: 557–561.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tomasz A. (1994) Multiple antibiotic-resistant pathogenic bacteria. A report on the Rockfeller University workshop. N. Engl. J. Med. 330: 1247–1251.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gold HS, Moellering RC. (1996) Antimicrobial drug-resistance. N. Engl. J. Med. 335: 1445–1453.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen ML. (1992) Epidemiology of drug resistance: implications for a post-antimicrobial era. Science 257: 1050–1055.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hawkey PM. (1998) Action against antibiotic resistance: no time to lose. Lancet 351: 1298–1299.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Spratt BG. (1996) Antibiotic resistance: counting the cost. Curr. Biol. 6: 1219–1221.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Biörkman J, Hughes D, Andersson DI. (1998) Virulence of antibiotic-resistant Salmonella typhimurium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 95: 3949–3953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Polonelli L, Morace G. (1986) Reevaluation of the yeast killer phenomenon. J. Clin. Microbiol. 24: 866–869.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Polonelli L, Conti S, Gerloni M, et al. (1991) “Antibiobodies”: antibiotic-like anti-idiotypic antibodies. J. Med. Vet. Mycol. 29: 235–242.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Polonelli L, Lorenzini R, De Bernardis F, et al. (1993) Idiotypic vaccination: immunoprotection mediated by anti-idiotypic antibodies with antibiotic activity. Scan. J. Immunol. 37: 105–110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Polonelli L, De Bernardis F, Conti S, et al. (1994) Idiotypic intravaginal vaccination to protect against candidal vaginitis by secretory, yeast killer toxin-like antiidiotypic antibodies. J. Immunol. 152: 3175–3182.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Polonelli L, Séguy N, Conti S, et al. (1997) Monoclonal yeast killer toxin-like candidacidal anti-idiotypic antibodies. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 4: 142–146.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Magliani W, Conti S, De Bernardis F, et al. (1997) Therapeutic potential of antiidiotypic single chain antibodies with yeast killer toxin activity. Nature Biotechnol. 15: 155–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Magliani W, Conti S, Gerloni M, Bertolotti D, Polonelli L. (1997) Yeast killer systems. Clin Microbiol Rev. 10: 369–400.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Conti S, Fanti F, Magliani W, et al. (1998) Mycobactericidal activity of human natural, monoclonal, and recombinant yeast killer toxin-like antibodies. J. Infect. Dis. 177: 807–811.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Séguy N, Polonelli L, Dei-Cas E, Cailliez JC. (1998) Perspectives in the control of Pneumocystis infections by using Pichia anomala killer toxinlike antiidiotypic antibodies. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 22: 145–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Polonelli L, De Bernardis F, Conti S, et al. (1996) Human natural yeast killer toxin-like candidacidal antibodies. J. Immunol. 156: 1880–1885.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Polonelli L, Morace G. (1987) Production and characterization of yeast killer toxin monoclonal antibodies. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25: 460–462.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Magliani W, Polonelli L, Conti S, et al. (1998) Neonatal mouse immunity against group B streptococcal infection by maternal vaccination with recombinant antiidiotypes. Nature Med. 4: 705–709.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moellering RC. (1998) Introduction: problems with antimicrobial resistance in gram-positive cocci. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26: 1177–1178.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1997) Update: Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin—United States. MMWR 46: 813–815.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hiramatsu K, Aritaka N, Hanaki H, et al. (1997) Dissemination in Japanese hospitals of strains of Staphylococcus aureus heterogeneously resistant to vancomycin. Lancet 350: 1670–1673.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sieradzki K, Roberts RB, Haber SW, Tomasz A. (1999) The development of vancomycin resistance in a patient with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 340: 517–523.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Schwalbe RS, Stapleton JT, Gilligan PH. (1987) Emergence of vancomycin resistance in coagulase-negative staphylococci. N. Engl. J. Med. 316: 927–931.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Veach LA, Pfaller MA, Barrett M, Koontz FP, Wenzel RP. (1990) Vancomycin resistance in Staphylococcus haemolyticus causing colonization and bloodstream infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 28: 2064–2068.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sieradzki K, Roberts RB, Serur D, Hargrave J, Tomasz A. (1998) Recurrent peritonitis in a patient on dialysis and prophylactic vancomycin. Lancet 351: 880–881.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. McMurray LW, Kernodle DS, Barg N. (1990) Characterization of a widespread strain of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus associated with nosocomial infections. J. Infect. Dis. 162: 759–762.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Murray BE. (1997) Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Am. J. Med. 102: 284–293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Moellering RC. (1998) Vancomycin-resistant enterococci. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26: 1196–1199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Moellering RC. (1991) The enterococcus: a classic example of the impact of antimicrobial resistance on therapeutic options. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 28: 1–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dutka-Malen S, Blaimont B, Wauters G, Courvalin P. (1994) Emergence of high-level resistance to glycopeptides in Enterococcus gallinarum and Enterococcus casseliflavus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 38: 1675–1677.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. French G, Abdulla Y, Heathcock R, Poston S, Cameron J. (1992) Vancomycin resistance in south London. Lancet 339: 818–819.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Fontana R, Ligozzi M, Pedrotti C, Padovani EM, Cornaglia G. (1997) Vancomycin-resistant Bacillus circulans carrying the vanA gene responsible for vancomycin resistance in enterococci. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 16: 473–474.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Poyart C, Pierre C, Quesne G, Pron B, Berche P, Trieu-Cuot P. (1997) Emergence of vancomycin resistance in the genus Streptococcus characterization of a vanB transferable determinant in Streptococcus bovis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 41: 24–29.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Tomasz A. (1997) Antibiotic resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24 (Suppl. 1): S85–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Novak R, Henriques B, Charpentier E, Normark S, Tuomanen E. (1999) Emergence of vancomycin tolerance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Nature 399: 590–593.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Boman HG. (1995) Peptide antibiotics and their role in innate immunity. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13: 61–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Hancock RE. (1997) Peptide antibiotics. Lancet 349: 418–422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lehrer RI, Lichtenstein AK, Ganz T. (1993) Defensins: antimicrobial and cytotoxic peptides of mammalian cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11: 105–128.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Nicolas P, Mor A. (1994) Peptides as weapons against microorganisms in the chemical defense system of vertebrates. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 49: 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Ministero della Sanità, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Programma Nazionale di Ricerca sull’AIDS—1998, Accordo di Collaborazione Scientifica n. 50B.32, and Ministero dell’Università e della Ricerca Scientifica e Tecnologica, Programmi di Ricerca Scientifica di Interesse Nazionale—1999.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to L. Polonelli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Conti, S., Magliani, W., Arseni, S. et al. In vitro Activity of Monoclonal and Recombinant Yeast Killer Toxin-like Antibodies Against Antibiotic-resistant Gram-positive Cocci. Mol Med 6, 613–619 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03401799

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03401799

Keywords