Skip to main content

Table 4 The comparison of criteria related to the best panels of the LASSO feature-based prediction model and RF-based generic prediction model

From: Identifying novel host-based diagnostic biomarker panels for COVID-19: a whole-blood/nasopharyngeal transcriptome meta-analysis

Tissue

Number of features

The best LASSO-based panels based on train and test sets

The best common-based panels based on train and test sets

Difference of accuracies

Sensitivity

Specificity

Accuracy

Sensitivity

Specificity

Accuracy

WB

3

0.906

0.923

0.911

0.938

0.769

0.889

0.022

4

0.906

0.923

0.911

0.969

0.692

0.889

0.022

5

0.906

0.923

0.911

0.969

0.769

0.911

0.000

6

1

0.923

0.978

0.938

0.846

0.911

0.067

7

1

0.923

0.978

0.938

0.846

0.911

0.067

8

1

0.923

0.978

0.938

0.846

0.911

0.067

9

1

0.923

0.978

0.906

0.846

0.889

0.089

NP

3

0.816

0.786

0.808

0.743

0.802

0.758

0.050

4

0.856

0.825

0.848

0.810

0.810

0.810

0.038

5

0.864

0.873

0.866

0.826

0.841

0.830

0.036

6

0.853

0.857

0.854

0.829

0.865

0.838

0.016

7

0.869

0.873

0.870

0.832

0.881

0.844

0.026

8

0.872

0.913

0.882

0.850

0.841

0.848

0.034

9

0.872

0.905

0.880

0.850

0.857

0.852

0.028

  1. WB whole blood, NP nasopharyngeal