Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparison of outcome-DFR association for two patient subgroups.a

From: A Genomic Score Prognostic of Outcome in Trauma Patients

 

Group 1

Group 2

Outcomeb

  

Days in ICU

4.8±0.9 (< 0.001)

0.5± 1.5 (0.74)

Days on ventilator

3.8±0.8 (< 0.001)

2.1±1.0 (0.04)

Hospital length of stay

7.1± 1.9 (< 0.001)

1.0±2.1 (0.65)

Maximum Marshall score

1.3±0.3 (< 0.001)

0.6± 0.3 (0.04)

Maximum Denver score

0.7±0.2 (< 0.001)

0.5± 0.2 (0.05)

Eventc

  

Mortality

2.7 (1.0,7.1) (0.05)

1.4 (0.5,3.9) (0.57)

MODS (Marshall criterion)

3.0 (1.6,5.7) (< 0.001)

1.1 (0.7,1.7) (0.78)

MODS (Denver criterion)

2.7 (1.3,6.0) (0.006)

1.7 (0.9,3.2) (0.08)

Nosocomial infections

1.9 (1.1, 3.2) (0.02)

1.1 (0.7,1.7) (0.72)

Surgical site infections

1.2 (0.70,2.4) (0.43)

1.5 (0.9,2.5) (0.15)

  1. aGroup 1 is 79 patients with DFR score based on 10 controls. Group 2 is 79 patients with DFR score based on 16 controls. Standardized scores were used. The mean and standard deviation used to standardize patient scores were: Group 1 DFR 13.97 (0.58), Group 2 DFR 14.46 (0.61).
  2. bThe model is Outcome = Intercept + α DFR + ε. Each table entry shows the estimated regression coefficient α, its standard error, and its significance.
  3. cFor event outcomes, the model is Log Odds (event) = Intercept + α DFR. Each table entry shows the estimated odds ratio, its 95% Cl, and its significance.
Back to article page

Molecular Medicine

ISSN: 1528-3658