Skip to main content

Table 1 Cosegregation analysis for representative microsatellite markers within the genomic loci on RNO4, −11 and −13.

From: Three Interacting Genomic Loci Incorporating Two Novel Mutations Underlie the Evolution of Diet-induced Diabetes

   

Genotype

AUC

ANOVA

LSD test

AVG

SEM

N

F

P

SS vs RR/SR

Single locus effect

 

RNO4

SS

40366

1969

44

46.02

<0.0001

P < 0.0001

 

locus

SR/RR

30511

533

188

   
 

RNO11

SS

35896

1455

60

11.64

0.0006

P = 0.0008

 

locus

SR/RR

31154

646

172

   
 

RNO13

SS

35651

1506

52

9.38

0.0025

P = 0.0025

 

locus

SR/RR

31256

639

171

   

Two loci effect

 

RNO4

RNO11

AVG

SEM

N

F

P

P value

1

SS

SS

47996

2962

12

  

1 vs 2 0.0054

2

SS

SR/RR

37505

2293

32

9.52

0.0002

1 vs 3 <0.0001

3

SR/RR

SS

32871

1355

32

  

2 vs 3 0.6510

 

RNO4

RNO13

AVG

SEM

N

F

P

P value

1

SS

SS

48558

8151

6

  

1 vs 2 0.0278

2

SS

SR/RR

38408

1787

37

6.09

0.0034

1 vs 3 0.0016

3

SR/RR

SS

33967

1181

46

  

2 vs 3 0.0543

 

RNO11

RNO13

AVG

SEM

N

F

P

P value

1

SS

SS

39222

3451

13

   

2

SS

SR/RR

34976

1658

47

0.95

0.3902

3

SR/RR

SS

34461

1726

39

   

Three loci effect

RNO4

RNO11

RNO13

AVG

SEM

N

F

P

P value

SR/RR

SR/RR

SR/RR

28592

531

105

   

1

SS

SR/RR

SR/RR

35135

1757

27

  

1 vs 2 0.0072

2

SS

SS

SR/RR

47244

3359

10

5.03

0.0115

1 vs 3 0.0628

3

SS

SR/RR

SS

46959

12431

4

  

2 vs 3 0.9669

1

SR/RR

SS

SR/RR

31661

15044

37

  

1 vs 2 0.1097

2

SR/RR

SS

SS

36944

2850

11

10.87

0.0001

1 vs 3 <0.0001

3

SS

SS

SR/RR

47244

3359

10

  

2 vs 3 0.0158

1

SR/RR

SR/RR

SS

33032

1252

35

  

1 vs 2 0.2592

2

SR/RR

SS

SS

36944

2850

11

3.82

0.0291

1 vs 3 0.0106

3

SS

SR/RR

SS

46959

1243

4

  

2 vs 3 0.0900

 

SS

SS

SS

51754

9959

2

   
  1. Data are presented for single locus, two loci and three loci effects, as the mean (AVG) of the area under the curve (AUC) after 1 month of DD, grouped by genotypes RR, SS and SR. Group averages were compared by one-way ANOVA, providing F and p values; post hoc analysis was performed using the least significant difference (LSD) test. SS, homozygous for CDs/y; SR, heterozygous homozygous for CDr/y.