Skip to main content

Addressing the ‘hypoxia paradox’ in severe COVID-19: literature review and report of four cases treated with erythropoietin analogues

Abstract

Background

Since fall 2019, SARS-CoV-2 spread world-wide, causing a major pandemic with estimated ~ 220 million subjects affected as of September 2021. Severe COVID-19 is associated with multiple organ failure, particularly of lung and kidney, but also grave neuropsychiatric manifestations. Overall mortality reaches > 2%. Vaccine development has thrived in thus far unreached dimensions and will be one prerequisite to terminate the pandemic. Despite intensive research, however, few treatment options for modifying COVID-19 course/outcome have emerged since the pandemic outbreak. Additionally, the substantial threat of serious downstream sequelae, called ‘long COVID’ and ‘neuroCOVID’, becomes increasingly evident.

Main body of the abstract

Among candidates that were suggested but did not yet receive appropriate funding for clinical trials is recombinant human erythropoietin. Based on accumulating experimental and clinical evidence, erythropoietin is expected to (1) improve respiration/organ function, (2) counteract overshooting inflammation, (3) act sustainably neuroprotective/neuroregenerative. Recent counterintuitive findings of decreased serum erythropoietin levels in severe COVID-19 not only support a relative deficiency of erythropoietin in this condition, which can be therapeutically addressed, but also made us coin the term ‘hypoxia paradox’. As we review here, this paradox is likely due to uncoupling of physiological hypoxia signaling circuits, mediated by detrimental gene products of SARS-CoV-2 or unfavorable host responses, including microRNAs or dysfunctional mitochondria. Substitution of erythropoietin might overcome this ‘hypoxia paradox’ caused by deranged signaling and improve survival/functional status of COVID-19 patients and their long-term outcome. As supporting hints, embedded in this review, we present 4 male patients with severe COVID-19 and unfavorable prognosis, including predicted high lethality, who all profoundly improved upon treatment which included erythropoietin analogues.

Short conclusion

Substitution of EPO may—among other beneficial EPO effects in severe COVID-19—circumvent downstream consequences of the ‘hypoxia paradox’. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial for proof-of-concept is warranted.

Background

Since December 2019, a pandemic, COVID-19, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (Lu et al. 2020; Zhou et al. 2020; Zhu et al. 2020), approached 220 million confirmed cases and led to the death of ~ 4.5 million people worldwide, as of September 2021. Despite considerable success in developing vaccines (Haas et al. 2021; Sahin et al. 2021), COVID-19 keeps progressing around the globe with very limited advancement in the development of drugs for COVID-19 treatment (Batista et al. 2021; Kim et al. 2020; Kluge et al. 2021; WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium 2021; World Health Organization 2021a, b).

SARS-CoV-2 is a beta-coronavirus that infects cells via the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. Multitropic by nature, it can in severe cases cause multi-organ failure, in particular of lung, heart, and kidney (Puelles et al. 2020). SARS-CoV-2 is often associated with a so-called cytokine storm (Fajgenbaum and June 2020; Mehta et al. 2020; Moore and June 2020), a hypercoagulable state (Bilaloglu et al. 2020; Klok et al. 2020; Levi et al. 2020), and induction of pronounced autoimmune reactions (Dotan et al. 2021; Halpert and Shoenfeld 2020; Wang et al. 2021). Via the olfactory mucosa, it penetrates to the central nervous system along the olfactory tract, appears to follow neuroanatomical structures, and affects predominantly the brainstem, including primary respiratory and cardiovascular control centers in the medulla oblongata (Matschke et al. 2020; Meinhardt et al. 2021). SARS-CoV-2 targets the blood–brain-barrier (BBB), affects endothelial cells (Buzhdygan et al. 2020; Rhea et al. 2021), and can lead to microvascular injury in the brain and spreading neuroinflammation of COVID-19 patients (Lee et al. 2021). Neurological manifestations or complications of COVID-19 disturb central and peripheral nervous system functions and structures, and have been shown in essentially all age groups (Kihira et al. 2020; LaRovere et al. 2021; Mao et al. 2020; Oxley et al. 2020; Paterson et al. 2020; Solomon 2021).

Persistent symptoms after recovery from the acute infection, referred to as post-acute or long COVID, as well as damage to the nervous system, inducing neuropsychiatric downstream syndromes, called neuroCOVID, may lead to significant long-term disability after survival of the acute phase (Al-Ramadan et al. 2021; Boldrini et al. 2021; Carfi et al. 2020; Davis et al. 2021; Huang et al. 2021; Iqbal et al. 2021; Nalbandian et al. 2021; Solomon et al. 2020; Sudre et al. 2021; Taquet et al. 2021; Townsend et al. 2020). Across brain cell types, COVID-19 perturbations overlap with those in chronic brain disorders and reside in genetic variants associated with cognition, schizophrenia, and depression (Yang et al. 2021). Due to the recognized neuroprotective, procognitive and neuroregenerative capacities of erythropoietin (EPO) in exactly these conditions, this very recent report strongly supports its application for preventing neuroCOVID, as outlined below. In general, host genetic factors influence the severity of the COVID-19 course (Kuo et al. 2020; Severe Covid-19 GWAS Group 2020). Among the risk genes is for instance the APOE4 allele that affects BBB integrity (Hammer et al. 2014; Kuo et al. 2020; Masoli et al. 2021; Montagne et al. 2020).

Despite intensive research within the last year, only few treatments for COVID-19 are currently available (Kim et al. 2020; Kluge et al. 2021; WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium 2021), and to date, no effective measures are known to improve conditions of long COVID or neuroCOVID (Llach and Vieta 2021). This scarcity of options for the management of COVID-19 and the emergence of ‘immune escape’ against established vaccines plus ‘breakthrough infections’ (Birhane et al. 2021; Edara et al. 2021; Garcia-Beltran et al. 2021; Li et al. 2021; Plante et al. 2021; Prevost and Finzi 2021; Thorne et al. 2021; Wall et al. 2021; Zhou et al. 2021), reducing the hope of a speedy termination of the pandemic, call for new strategies to treat COVID-19. Based on the known neuroprotective and anti-inflammatory features of EPO, and its proven efficacy and excellent tolerability in different neuropsychiatric conditions (Ehrenreich et al. 2020; Miskowiak et al. 2021; Sargin et al. 2010; Sirén et al. 2009), we proposed the use of recombinant human (rh) EPO for the treatment of severely affected COVID-19 patients. The sketched double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial (Ehrenreich et al. 2020), has not yet received appropriate funding. However, our proposal is now strongly reinforced by further post-mortem data on COVID-19 (Yang et al. 2021). Here we present four cases of severe COVID-19 and unfavorable prognosis, that received EPO analogues. These were the only cases we became aware of except for a published case report (Hadadi et al. 2020). We report the disease course of these male patients upon treatment and discuss possible mechanisms contributing to their beneficial outcome.

Cases

The 4 patients (individual synopses presented in Table 1) were all men in the range of 58 to 80 years, who presented with dyspnea, malaise, and other nonspecific signs of viral infection, and were confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab and PCR to be positive for SARS-CoV-2. All patients progressed swiftly to respiratory failure, were critically ill, hospitalized and treated in intensive care units (ICUs) for variable length of time. The duration of severe hypoxia, requiring oxygen supplementation, amounted to only 3 days in case 1—under the immediately started rhEPO application as compassionate use approach, in absence of any approved treatment for severe COVID-19. This unusually fast improvement may at least hypothetically be attributable to EPO. The underlying beneficial effects likely go beyond erythropoiesis and include counteraction of the complex pathophysiology of COVID-19 as delineated in the present paper and previous reviews on EPO in COVID-19 (Ehrenreich et al. 2020; Sahebnasagh et al. 2020). The 3 other patients (cases 2–4) developed severe acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), clinically reflected by the need for invasive ventilatory settings, and additional prone positioning. Acute renal injury and cardio-circulatory deterioration were swiftly prominent in these patients and led to an instant treatment with EPO analogues. Cases 2 and 4 needed renal replacement therapy. Cases 2–4 were on anticoagulation treatment as is the standard for COVID-19 in German intensive care units, at least the low molecular weight heparin for prophylaxis of venous thrombosis. All 4 patients of our case report series were anemic, additionally underlining their severe disease state (Taneri et al. 2020). None of them received blood transfusions. The iron status of all remained within the normal range or close to normal (transferrin saturation 12–31%; normal range 16–45%). Other laboratory values, as much as available for all four cases, were further consistent with a severe course of COVID-19 with hypoxia and highly elevated inflammatory markers in the sense of a cytokine storm (Table 1). All 4 patients received injections of rhEPO analogues, according to conventional dosing for anemia treatment in nephrology (around 2000–4000 IU per injection), and recovered either during hospitalization (Case 1; the least severe of our cases) or during rehabilitation care (Cases 2–4).

Table 1 Synopsis of 4 male COVID-19 patients treated with EPO analogues

Discussion

We recently advocated the use of rhEPO for supportive treatment of severe COVID-19, provided a comprehensive review backing this idea, and published the design of a clinical trial (Ehrenreich et al. 2020). So far, we did not succeed in obtaining the necessary funding for a clinical study. Since rhEPO has been approved for decades as well-tolerated and safe anemia drug, funding agencies send applicants for clinical rhEPO projects to industry or at least request industry to take a share in the costs of a clinical trial. Upon patent expiration in 2008, however, industry faces competition for the highly lucrative anemia market by biosimilar producers and fears off-label use and emergence of new side effects, thus unfortunately does not welcome clinical research on further rhEPO indications. Hence, at this point, we can only present as further supporting hints for our concept, 4 male patients with severe COVID-19 who were treated with EPO analogues. These were the only COVID-19 cases who received EPO analogues we became aware of and had access to. In all cases, EPO was well tolerated and associated with remarkable recovery despite severe COVID-19 with multiple critical complications, including respiratory and renal failure, documented cytokine storm, and critical illness polyneuropathy. Additional factors in our cases, known to be associated with unfavorable prognosis in hospitalized patients, were older age, male gender, and their comorbidities (Becher and Frerichs 2020).

We had originally considered for our small case series a ‘center control group’, however, had to surrender this plan because in our hospital, sufficient numbers of adequate male patients with comparable age and disease severity would not have been available for a convincing ‘twin-matching’ (which would require at least 1:3 or 1:4, i.e. N = 12–16 suitable ‘statistical twins’). Instead, and also to avoid an impression of ‘cherry picking’ controls post-hoc, we cite outcomes of highly representative German surveys, e.g. on 10,021 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 920 German hospitals (Karagiannidis et al. 2020). In-hospital mortality in mechanically ventilated patients requiring dialysis was here 73% (342 of 469). In the respective observational time period of our cases, the mortality of mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients in ICUs in Germany remained at 50% across age groups even with introduction of additional therapeutic measures like early corticosteroids/dexamethasone or IL-6 blockade (Karagiannidis et al. 2021; Kluge et al. 2021; Wilkinson 2020). Clinical course and laboratory values in cases 2–4 showed dramatic increases in IL-6, often as part of the cytokine storm and predictor of poor survival (Chang et al. 2021; Chen et al. 2020; Mehta et al. 2020; Moore and June 2020; Tan et al. 2020; Webb et al. 2020).

In striking contrast to the very poor prognosis is the outcome with full recovery of all patients. The here presented four cases are consistent with a prior case report of an 80 year-old man with multiple medical comorbidities who recovered completely after EPO treatment (Hadadi et al. 2020). The total EPO equivalent dose that this case and our 4 patients received, ranged between 10,000 and 20,000 IU (100–200 µg) over 1–5 weeks, corresponding to the conventional dosing for anemia treatment in nephrology (around 2000–4000 IU per injection). These doses are low as compared to those needed for improving cognition and motor performance in neuropsychiatric indications like multiple sclerosis, schizophrenia or affective disorders (Ehrenreich et al. 2007a, b; Miskowiak et al. 2014a, b) or for reducing progressive brain matter loss in these conditions (Miskowiak et al. 2015; Wüstenberg et al. 2011). Although the presence of a slightly compromised BBB in some patients suffering from these neuropsychiatric diseases is well established and allows a higher quantity of EPO to reach the brain (Ehrenreich et al. 2004), it is unlikely equivalent to the massive BBB breakdown expected in severe COVID-19 with the typical cytokine storm. This may explain why in COVID-19 comparably low doses seem sufficient also for improving neurological sequelae which was not the case in e.g. multiple sclerosis (Ehrenreich et al. 2007a). Nevertheless, in a potential clinical trial, investigating EPO treatment for improving outcome of severe COVID-19 patients (Ehrenreich et al. 2020), and particularly for preventing neuroCOVID and long COVID (Llach and Vieta 2021), at least 10× higher doses may have to be tested—perhaps as parallel study arm—to disclose the optimal amount required for these conditions.

Safety issues

Overall, in critically ill patients, EPO is safe and probably efficient, as summarized in recent meta-analyses (Litton et al. 2019; Mesgarpour et al. 2017). Nevertheless, employing EPO in severe COVID-19 for improving acute and downstream outcome (long COVID), requires watchful and comprehensive safety management as much as in all other EPO indications and, in particular, when using high doses of EPO to obtain sufficient levels also in brain (Bartels et al. 2008). Careful observation and follow-up at all times is mandatory, including clinical examination (blood pressure monitoring etc.) as well as routine laboratory screening (hematocrit, hemoglobin, thrombocyte counts etc.) during the period of EPO application to prevent augmentation of prothrombotic constellations in addition to the known hypercoagulable state in COVID-19 (Bilaloglu et al. 2020; Klok et al. 2020; Levi et al. 2020). Hematocrit/hemoglobin have to stay within clearly defined limits. Although the necessity of blood lettings in COVID-19 is expectedly extremely low due to the here reviewed reduced production of and/or response to EPO, in the unlikely situation of hematocrit increase towards the upper limit, blood letting should be initiated. Along the same lines, no iron substitution is allowed in this indication at any time, as it could possibly induce undesired ‘side effects’ in non-anemic COVID-19 patients. Iron substitution, as performed in studies targeting pure anemia, acts pro-inflammatory and may push hematopoiesis, even though expectedly weaker in the inflammatory environment of COVID-19. The fact that EPO treatment leads to temporary shifts in iron stores, and upon longterm application causes a picture similar to that of true iron deficiency, as reported in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis (Ehrenreich et al. 2007a), might even provide additional benefit for COVID-19 patients, adding to the panel of protective effects of this growth factor. Notably, also iron chelators have been proposed for treatment of COVID-19 (Carota et al. 2021).

Hypothetical explanations of the ‘hypoxia paradox’

Surprisingly, recent reports showed decreased serum EPO levels in patients with severe COVID-19 (Viruez-Soto et al. 2021; Yagci et al. 2021). In the context of hypoxia, as experienced in this condition, we would rather have expected increased levels of EPO as a hypoxia-inducible growth factor (Brines and Cerami 2005; Jelkmann 1992; Krantz 1991). This phenomenon, which we coined ‘hypoxia paradox’, likely contributes to unfavorable outcomes in COVID-19. Along these lines of thought, people living at high-altitude have elevated levels of serum EPO and are therefore believed to be better protected from a severe course of COVID-19 (Arias-Reyes et al. 2020, 2021; Beall 2007; Jaramillo et al. 2021; Soliz et al. 2020; Viruez-Soto et al. 2021; Zubieta-Calleja et al. 2020). In our patients, serum EPO levels were not available, as EPO determinations are not part of any clinical laboratory routine, but an assumption of diminished levels would perfectly fit with their documented anemia prior to EPO treatment (Table 1). Interestingly, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis also reported that severe COVID-19 cases had lower hemoglobin levels compared to moderate cases (Taneri et al. 2020). However, even if baseline serum EPO concentrations in our patients had been normal, not lowered (which we do not know), this would not abrogate potential beneficial effects of exogenous rhEPO administration.

The apparent ‘hypoxia paradox’ indicates dysfunctional signaling of the hypoxia circuitry required for the induction of EPO. The molecular mechanisms behind this ‘hypoxia paradox’ are still widely unknown. Several hypotheses that will have to be experimentally addressed in the future are listed here and sketched in Fig. 1:

Fig. 1
figure1

Suppression of EPO expression as a consequence of SARS-CoV2 infection and the rationale for rhEPO supplementation. Putative action of viral nonstructural proteins (NSP) and viral proteases on host protein biosynthesis and stability of host proteins (see text for references and details). Failure of EPO response to hypoxia may result in anemia and enhanced tissue/brain/neural injury. External EPO or EPO biosimilars are expected to combat anemia, reconstitute neuroprotection and tissue protection and mediate beneficial immune modulation. PAMP (pathogen-associated molecular pattern) and DAMP (damage-associated molecular pattern) recognition can induce primary and secondary cytokine storms, respectively. EPO suppression by TNFα and by TNFα/NF-κB-mediated induction of miR-122 has been demonstrated under various inflammatory conditions (Cluzeau et al. 2017; Rivkin et al. 2016). Anti-inflammatory actions, vascular protection and beneficial effects of EPO on respiratory functions have been reviewed in detail earlier (Ehrenreich et al. 2020)

  1. 1.

    Mitochondrial dysfunction: SARS-CoV-2 obviously hijacks host mitochondria in COVID-19 pathogenesis (Singh et al. 2020). By SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map (Gordon et al. 2020) or by combining an RNA-centric approach and functional CRISPR screens, physical and functional connection between SARS-CoV-2 and mitochondria has been demonstrated, highlighting this organelle as a general platform for antiviral activity (Flynn et al. 2021). Moreover, altered expression of mitochondrial genes has been demonstrated by scRNAseq in a primate model of Corona infection (Speranza et al. 2021), and SARS-CoV-2 downregulated nuclear-encoded mitochondrial genes related to cellular respiration and complex I (Miller et al. 2021). Mitochondrial dysfunction has further been reported in the context of metabolic programs that define dysfunctional immune responses in severe COVID-19 (Thompson et al. 2021).

    Hypoxia signaling via HIF-1α and dioxygenase enzymes, prolyl hydroxylases 1,2,3 (PHD1,2,3), requires intact mitochondria. In COVID-19 sepsis, mitochondria become dysfunctional through a disturbed HIF-1α/sirtuin pathway (Shenoy 2020). Mitochondrial function and HIF are intimately interconnected to regulate each other (Tormos and Chandel 2010), and their impairment may well contribute to uncoupling of the hypoxia pathway. Tissue proteomic studies in turn showed the induction of hypoxia pathways in different organs of patients who deceased from COVID-19, but did not list EPO (Nie et al. 2021). This is perhaps less surprising, considering that due to its very low expression, mRNA of EPO regularly escapes single cell mRNA-seq analysis, a known dropout effect of this methodology. We note that EPO is an extremely potent hypoxia-inducible factor, locally effective in auto-paracrine fashion at femtomol concentrations (Butt et al. 2021; Wakhloo et al. 2020). In the situation of COVID-19, however, the low expression is likely further inhibited as a result of the uncoupled hypoxia pathway.

  2. 2.

    Inflammation and biosynthesis of EPO: Inflammatory processes induce the expression of microRNA122 that targets an evolutionary well-preserved seed site in the 3ʹUTR of EPO leading to reduced biosynthesis of EPO in the kidney (Rivkin et al. 2016). Moreover, proinflammatory proteins S100A9 and TNFα suppress EPO expression e.g. in myelodysplastic syndrome (Cluzeau et al. 2017). EPO biosynthesis might be further inhibited by viral gene products like NSP1 (nonstructural protein 1) which suppresses production of a whole array of host proteins (Yuan et al. 2020). This could also occur via derangement of host signaling circuitries as shown for structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2 (Jakhmola et al. 2021).

  3. 3.

    Proteolysis and degradation of EPO: The viral serine proteases such as NSP3 and/or NSP5 (Dai et al. 2020; Osipiuk et al. 2021; Zhang et al. 2020) might target EPO as well and lead to its proteolysis. Interestingly, recently identified inhibitors against the SARS-CoV-2 encoded main protease have been suggested as a treatment option for COVID-19 (Günther et al. 2021). In addition, host proteases that are induced in severe COVID-19 might proteolyse EPO.

  4. 4.

    EPO efficiency: In addition to its reduced production or enhanced degradation, leading to low circulating levels, the efficiency of EPO is likely reduced upon inflammation, as long known for its hematopoietic effects. This relative hyporesponsiveness of the haematopoietic system to EPO in systemic inflammatory conditions has been explained by altered cytokine patterns that modulate the bone marrow response to EPO (Kwack and Balakrishnan 2006). This may be partially overcome by higher doses and does not necessarily reflect on extrahematopoietic effectiveness of EPO (Ehrenreich et al. 2007a).

Conclusions

Substitution of EPO appears as a rational strategy (Fig. 1) to circumvent downstream consequences of the ‘hypoxia paradox’, including dysfunctional synthesis or accelerated inactivation of endogenous EPO, in addition to the likely beneficial pharmacological profile of EPO applications pointed out earlier (Ehrenreich et al. 2020; Leventhal et al. 2020; Sahebnasagh et al. 2020). The obvious limitation of the present work is that case reports can only serve as first hints and ultimately require rigorous confirmation in a clinically controlled setting. An appropriate double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial is prerequisite for claiming any beneficial effects of rhEPO or biosimilars for the treatment of severely affected COVID-19 patients as well as for preventing COVID-19 downstream sequelae, long COVID and neuroCOVID.

Availability of supporting data

Not applicable.

References

  1. Al-Ramadan A, Rabab’h O, Shah J, Gharaibeh A. Acute and post-acute neurological complications of COVID-19. Neurol Int. 2021;13:102–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/neurolint13010010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Arias-Reyes C, Zubieta-Deurioste N, Poma-Machicao L, Aliaga-Raduan F, Carvajal-Rodriguez F, Dutschmann M, et al. Does the pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 virus decrease at high-altitude? Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020;277:103443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2020.103443.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Arias-Reyes C, Carvajal-Rodriguez F, Poma-Machicao L, Aliaga-Raduan F, Marques DA, Zubieta-Deurioste N, et al. Decreased incidence, virus transmission capacity, and severity of COVID-19 at altitude on the American continent. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0237294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237294.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bartels C, Spate K, Krampe H, Ehrenreich H. Recombinant human erythropoietin: novel strategies for neuroprotective/neuro-regenerative treatment of multiple sclerosis. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2008;1:193–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756285608098422.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Batista C, Shoham S, Ergonul O, Hotez P, Bottazzi ME, Figueroa JP, et al. Urgent needs to accelerate the race for COVID-19 therapeutics. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;36:100911. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100911.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Beall CM. Detecting natural selection in high-altitude human populations. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2007;158:161–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2007.05.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Becher T, Frerichs I. Mortality in COVID-19 is not merely a question of resource availability. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:832–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30312-x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bilaloglu S, Aphinyanaphongs Y, Jones S, Iturrate E, Hochman J, Berger JS. Thrombosis in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 in a New York City health system. JAMA. 2020;324:799–801. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.13372.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Birhane M, Bressler S, Chang G, Clark T, Dorough L, Fischer M, et al. COVID-19 vaccine breakthrough infections reported to CDC—United States, January 1–April 30, 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:792–3. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7021e3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Boldrini M, Canoll PD, Klein RS. How COVID-19 affects the brain. JAMA Psychiat. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brines M, Cerami A. Emerging biological roles for erythropoietin in the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005;6:484–94. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1687.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Butt UJ, Steixner-Kumar AA, Depp C, Sun T, Hassouna I, Wustefeld L, et al. Hippocampal neurons respond to brain activity with functional hypoxia. Mol Psychiatry. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-020-00988-w.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Buzhdygan TP, Deore BJ, Baldwin-Leclair A, Bullock TA, Mcgary HM, Khan JA, et al. The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein alters barrier function in 2D static and 3D microfluidic in-vitro models of the human blood-brain barrier. Neurobiol Dis. 2020;146:105131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbd.2020.105131.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Carfi A, Bernabei R, Landi F, Gemelli Against, C.-P.-a.C.S.G. Persistent symptoms in patients after acute COVID-19. JAMA. 2020;324:603–5. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12603.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Carota G, Ronsisvalle S, Panarello F, Tibullo D, Nicolosi A, Li Volti G. Role of iron chelation and protease inhibition of natural products on COVID-19 infection. J Clin Med. 2021;10:2306. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10112306.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang R, Elhusseiny KM, Yeh YC, Sun WZ. COVID-19 ICU and mechanical ventilation patient characteristics and outcomes-a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0246318. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246318.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen C, Wang H, Liang Z, Peng L, Zhao F, Yang L, et al. Predicting illness severity and short-term outcomes of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study in China. Innovation (n y). 2020;1:100007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2020.04.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cluzeau T, Mcgraw KL, Irvine B, Masala E, Ades L, Basiorka AA, et al. Pro-inflammatory proteins S100A9 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha suppress erythropoietin elaboration in myelodysplastic syndromes. Haematologica. 2017;102:2015–20. https://doi.org/10.3324/haematol.2016.158857.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Dai W, Zhang B, Jiang XM, Su H, Li J, Zhao Y, et al. Structure-based design of antiviral drug candidates targeting the SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Science. 2020;368:1331–5. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb4489.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis HE, Assaf GS, Mccorkell L, Wei H, Low RJ, Re’em Y, et al. Characterizing long COVID in an international cohort: 7 months of symptoms and their impact. medRxiv. 2021;2020.2012.2024.20248802. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.24.20248802.

  21. Dotan A, Muller S, Kanduc D, David P, Halpert G, Shoenfeld Y. The SARS-CoV-2 as an instrumental trigger of autoimmunity. Autoimmun Rev. 2021;20: 102792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2021.102792.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Edara VV, Norwood C, Floyd K, Lai L, Davis-Gardner ME, Hudson WH, et al. Infection- and vaccine-induced antibody binding and neutralization of the B.1.351 SARS-CoV-2 variant. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:516-521.e513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.009.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Ehrenreich H, Degner D, Meller J, Brines M, Behe M, Hasselblatt M, et al. Erythropoietin: a candidate compound for neuroprotection in schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2004;9:42–54. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001442.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ehrenreich H, Fischer B, Norra C, Schellenberger F, Stender N, Stiefel M, et al. Exploring recombinant human erythropoietin in chronic progressive multiple sclerosis. Brain. 2007a;130:2577–88. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ehrenreich H, Hinze-Selch D, Stawicki S, Aust C, Knolle-Veentjer S, Wilms S, et al. Improvement of cognitive functions in chronic schizophrenic patients by recombinant human erythropoietin. Mol Psychiatry. 2007b;12:206–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.mp.4001907.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ehrenreich H, Weissenborn K, Begemann M, Busch M, Vieta E, Miskowiak KW. Erythropoietin as candidate for supportive treatment of severe COVID-19. Mol Med. 2020;26:58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-020-00186-y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Fajgenbaum DC, June CH. Cytokine storm. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2255–73. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra2026131.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Flynn RA, Belk JA, Qi Y, Yasumoto Y, Wei J, Alfajaro MM, et al. Discovery and functional interrogation of SARS-CoV-2 RNA-host protein interactions. Cell. 2021;184:2394-2411.e2316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.012.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Garcia-Beltran WF, Lam EC, St Denis K, Nitido AD, Garcia ZH, Hauser BM, et al. Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity. Cell. 2021;184:2372-2383.e2379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Gordon DE, Jang GM, Bouhaddou M, Xu J, Obernier K, White KM, et al. A SARS-CoV-2 protein interaction map reveals targets for drug repurposing. Nature. 2020;583:459–68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2286-9.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Günther S, Reinke PYA, Fernandez-Garcia Y, Lieske J, Lane TJ, Ginn HM, et al. X-ray screening identifies active site and allosteric inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 main protease. Science. 2021;372:642–6. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abf7945.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Haas EJ, Angulo FJ, Mclaughlin JM, Anis E, Singer SR, Khan F, et al. Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data. Lancet. 2021;397:1819–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00947-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Hadadi A, Mortezazadeh M, Kolahdouzan K, Alavian G. Does recombinant human erythropoietin administration in critically ill COVID-19 patients have miraculous therapeutic effects? J Med Virol. 2020;92:915–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25839.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Halpert G, Shoenfeld Y. SARS-CoV-2, the autoimmune virus. Autoimmun Rev. 2020;19:102695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autrev.2020.102695.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Hammer C, Stepniak B, Schneider A, Papiol S, Tantra M, Begemann M, et al. Neuropsychiatric disease relevance of circulating anti-NMDA receptor autoantibodies depends on blood-brain barrier integrity. Mol Psychiatry. 2014;19:1143–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.110.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Huang CL, Huang LX, Wang YM, Li X, Ren LL, Gu XY, et al. 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from hospital: a cohort study. Lancet. 2021;397:220–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32656-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Iqbal FM, Lam K, Sounderajah V, Clarke JM, Ashrafian H, Darzi A. Characteristics and predictors of acute and chronic post-COVID syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2021;36:100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100899.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Jakhmola S, Indari O, Kashyap D, Varshney N, Das A, Manivannan E, et al. Mutational analysis of structural proteins of SARS-CoV-2. Heliyon. 2021;7:e06572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06572.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Jaramillo PRM, Simbaña-Rivera K, Silva JVV, Gómez-Barreno L, Campoverde ABV, Cevallos JFN, et al. High-altitude is associated with better short-term survival in critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU. medRxiv. 2021;2021.2001.2022.21249811. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.22.21249811.

  40. Jelkmann W. Erythropoietin: structure, control of production, and function. Physiol Rev. 1992;72:449–89. https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.1992.72.2.449.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Karagiannidis C, Mostert C, Hentschker C, Voshaar T, Malzahn J, Schillinger G, et al. Case characteristics, resource use, and outcomes of 10 021 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 920 German hospitals: an observational study. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:853–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2213-2600(20)30316-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Karagiannidis C, Windisch W, Mcauley DF, Welte T, Busse R. Major differences in ICU admissions during the first and second COVID-19 wave in Germany. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9:e47–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00101-6.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Kihira S, Morgenstern PF, Raynes H, Naidich TP, Belani P. Fatal cerebral infarct in a child with COVID-19. Pediatr Radiol. 2020;50:1479–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-020-04779-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kim PS, Read SW, Fauci AS. Therapy for early COVID-19: a critical need. JAMA. 2020;324:2149–50. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.22813.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Klok FA, Kruip M, Van Der Meer NJM, Arbous MS, Gommers D, Kant KM, et al. Incidence of thrombotic complications in critically ill ICU patients with COVID-19. Thromb Res. 2020;191:145–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.04.013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Kluge S, Janssens U, Spinner CD, Pfeifer M, Marx G, Karagiannidis C, et al. Clinical practice guideline: recommendations on inpatient treatment of patients with COVID-19. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Krantz SB. Erythropoietin. Blood. 1991;77:419–34. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.V77.3.419.419.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Kuo CL, Pilling LC, Atkins JL, Masoli JAH, Delgado J, Kuchel GA, et al. APOE e4 genotype predicts severe COVID-19 in the UK biobank community cohort. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2020;75:2231–2. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glaa131.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Kwack C, Balakrishnan VS. Managing erythropoietin hyporesponsiveness. Semin Dial. 2006;19:146–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-139X.2006.00141.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Larovere KL, Riggs BJ, Poussaint TY, Young CC, Newhams MM, Maamari M, et al. Neurologic involvement in children and adolescents hospitalized in the United States for COVID-19 or multisystem inflammatory syndrome. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78:536–47. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Lee MH, Perl DP, Nair G, Li W, Maric D, Murray H, et al. Microvascular injury in the brains of patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:481–3. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2033369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Leventhal J, Angeletti A, Cravedi P. EPO in patients with COVID-19: more than an erythropoietic hormone. Am J Kidney Dis. 2020;76:441. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.06.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Levi M, Thachil J, Iba T, Levy JH. Coagulation abnormalities and thrombosis in patients with COVID-19. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7:e438–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-3026(20)30145-9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Li T, Huang T, Guo C, Wang A, Shi X, Mo X, et al. Genomic variation, origin tracing, and vaccine development of SARS-CoV-2: a systematic review. Innovation (n y). 2021;2:100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Litton E, Latham P, Inman J, Luo J, Allan P. Safety and efficacy of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2019;45:1190–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-019-05686-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Llach CD, Vieta E. Mind long COVID: psychiatric sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;49:119–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.04.019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, Niu P, Yang B, Wu H, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet. 2020;395:565–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Mao L, Jin H, Wang M, Hu Y, Chen S, He Q, et al. Neurologic manifestations of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 in Wuhan, China. JAMA Neurol. 2020;77:683–90. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.1127.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Masoli J, Kuo CL, Atkins J, Pilling L, Delgado J, Kuchel G, et al. 38 Dementia, Apoe and COVID-19 severity. Age Ageing. 2021;50:i7–11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab029.17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Matschke J, Lutgehetmann M, Hagel C, Sperhake JP, Schroder AS, Edler C, et al. Neuropathology of patients with COVID-19 in Germany: a post-mortem case series. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:919–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30308-2.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Mehta P, Mcauley DF, Brown M, Sanchez E, Tattersall RS, Manson JJ, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395:1033–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Meinhardt J, Radke J, Dittmayer C, Franz J, Thomas C, Mothes R, et al. Olfactory transmucosal SARS-CoV-2 invasion as a port of central nervous system entry in individuals with COVID-19. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:168–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00758-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Mesgarpour B, Heidinger BH, Roth D, Schmitz S, Walsh CD, Herkner H. Harms of off-label erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for critically ill people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;8:CD010969. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010969.pub2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Miller B, Silverstein A, Flores M, Cao K, Kumagai H, Mehta HH, et al. Host mitochondrial transcriptome response to SARS-CoV-2 in multiple cell models and clinical samples. Sci Rep. 2021;11:3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-79552-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Miskowiak KW, Ehrenreich H, Christensen EM, Kessing LV, Vinberg M. Recombinant human erythropoietin to target cognitive dysfunction in bipolar disorder: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014a;75:1347–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Miskowiak KW, Vinberg M, Christensen EM, Bukh JD, Harmer CJ, Ehrenreich H, et al. Recombinant human erythropoietin for treating treatment-resistant depression: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2014b;39:1399–408. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2013.335.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Miskowiak KW, Vinberg M, Macoveanu J, Ehrenreich H, Koster N, Inkster B, et al. Effects of erythropoietin on hippocampal volume and memory in mood disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 2015;78:270–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.12.013.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Miskowiak KW, Johnsen S, Sattler SM, Nielsen S, Kunalan K, Rungby J, et al. Cognitive impairments four months after COVID-19 hospital discharge: pattern, severity and association with illness variables. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2021;46:39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2021.03.019.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Montagne A, Nation DA, Sagare AP, Barisano G, Sweeney MD, Chakhoyan A, et al. APOE4 leads to blood-brain barrier dysfunction predicting cognitive decline. Nature. 2020;581:71–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2247-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Moore JB, June CH. Cytokine release syndrome in severe COVID-19. Science. 2020;368:473–4. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb8925.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Nalbandian A, Sehgal K, Gupta A, Madhavan MV, Mcgroder C, Stevens JS, et al. Post-acute COVID-19 syndrome. Nat Med. 2021;27:601–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01283-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Nie X, Qian L, Sun R, Huang B, Dong X, Xiao Q, et al. Multi-organ proteomic landscape of COVID-19 autopsies. Cell. 2021;184:775-791.e714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.004.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  73. Osipiuk J, Azizi SA, Dvorkin S, Endres M, Jedrzejczak R, Jones KA, et al. Structure of papain-like protease from SARS-CoV-2 and its complexes with non-covalent inhibitors. Nat Commun. 2021;12:743. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21060-3.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. Oxley TJ, Mocco J, Majidi S, Kellner CP, Shoirah H, Singh IP, et al. Large-vessel stroke as a presenting feature of Covid-19 in the young. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:e60. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2009787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Paterson RW, Brown RL, Benjamin L, Nortley R, Wiethoff S, Bharucha T, et al. The emerging spectrum of COVID-19 neurology: clinical, radiological and laboratory findings. Brain. 2020;143:3104–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awaa240.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Plante JA, Mitchell BM, Plante KS, Debbink K, Weaver SC, Menachery VD. The variant gambit: COVID-19’s next move. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:508–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2021.02.020.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  77. Prevost J, Finzi A. The great escape? SARS-CoV-2 variants evading neutralizing responses. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:322–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2021.02.010.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Puelles VG, Lutgehetmann M, Lindenmeyer MT, Sperhake JP, Wong MN, Allweiss L, et al. Multiorgan and renal tropism of SARS-CoV-2. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:590–2. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2011400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Rhea EM, Logsdon AF, Hansen KM, Williams LM, Reed MJ, Baumann KK, et al. The S1 protein of SARS-CoV-2 crosses the blood-brain barrier in mice. Nat Neurosci. 2021;24:368–78. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00771-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Rivkin M, Simerzin A, Zorde-Khvalevsky E, Chai C, Yuval JB, Rosenberg N, et al. Inflammation-induced expression and secretion of microRNA 122 leads to reduced blood levels of kidney-derived erythropoietin and anemia. Gastroenterology. 2016;151:999-1010.e1013. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2016.07.031.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Sahebnasagh A, Mojtahedzadeh M, Najmeddin F, Najafi A, Safdari M, Rezai Ghaleno H, et al. A perspective on erythropoietin as a potential adjuvant therapy for acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19. Arch Med Res. 2020;51:631–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2020.08.002.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Sahin U, Muik A, Vogler I, Derhovanessian E, Kranz LM, Vormehr M, et al. BNT162b2 vaccine induces neutralizing antibodies and poly-specific T cells in humans. Nature. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03653-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Sargin D, Friedrichs H, El-Kordi A, Ehrenreich H. Erythropoietin as neuroprotective and neuroregenerative treatment strategy: comprehensive overview of 12 years of preclinical and clinical research. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2010;24:573–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpa.2010.10.005.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Severe Covid-19 Gwas Group. Genomewide association study of severe covid-19 with respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1522–34. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2020283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Shenoy S. Coronavirus (Covid-19) sepsis: revisiting mitochondrial dysfunction in pathogenesis, aging, inflammation, and mortality. Inflamm Res. 2020;69:1077–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-020-01389-z.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Singh KK, Chaubey G, Chen JY, Suravajhala P. Decoding SARS-CoV-2 hijacking of host mitochondria in COVID-19 pathogenesis. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2020;319:C258–67. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00224.2020.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  87. Sirén AL, Fasshauer T, Bartels C, Ehrenreich H. Therapeutic potential of erythropoietin and its structural or functional variants in the nervous system. Neurotherapeutics. 2009;6:108–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurt.2008.10.041.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  88. Soliz J, Schneider-Gasser EM, Arias-Reyes C, Aliaga-Raduan F, Poma-Machicao L, Zubieta-Calleja G, et al. Coping with hypoxemia: could erythropoietin (EPO) be an adjuvant treatment of COVID-19? Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2020;279:103476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2020.103476.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Solomon T. Neurological infection with SARS-CoV-2—the story so far. Nat Rev Neurol. 2021;17:65–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-020-00453-w.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Solomon IH, Normandin E, Bhattacharyya S, Mukerji SS, Keller K, Ali AS, et al. Neuropathological features of Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:989–92. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2019373.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Speranza E, Williamson BN, Feldmann F, Sturdevant GL, Perez-Perez L, Meade-White K, et al. Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals SARS-CoV-2 infection dynamics in lungs of African green monkeys. Sci Transl Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1126/scitranslmed.abe8146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Sudre CH, Murray B, Varsavsky T, Graham MS, Penfold RS, Bowyer RC, et al. Attributes and predictors of long COVID. Nat Med. 2021;27:626–31. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-021-01292-y.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Tan L, Kang X, Ji X, Li G, Wang Q, Li Y, et al. Validation of predictors of disease severity and outcomes in COVID-19 patients: a descriptive and retrospective study. Med (n y). 2020;1:128-138.e123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medj.2020.05.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Taneri PE, Gomez-Ochoa SA, Llanaj E, Raguindin PF, Rojas LZ, Roa-Diaz ZM, et al. Anemia and iron metabolism in COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2020;35:763–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-020-00678-5.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Taquet M, Geddes JR, Husain M, Luciano S, Harrison PJ. 6-month neurological and psychiatric outcomes in 236 379 survivors of COVID-19: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. Lancet Psychiatry. 2021;8:416–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00084-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Thompson EA, Cascino K, Ordonez AA, Zhou W, Vaghasia A, Hamacher-Brady A, et al. Metabolic programs define dysfunctional immune responses in severe COVID-19 patients. Cell Rep. 2021;34:108863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108863.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. Thorne LG, Bouhaddou M, Reuschl A-K, Zuliani-Alvarez L, Polacco BJ, Pelin A, et al. Evolution of enhanced innate immune evasion by the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 UK variant. bioRxiv. 2021;2021.2006.2006.446826. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.06.446826.

  98. Tormos KV, Chandel NS. Inter-connection between mitochondria and HIFs. J Cell Mol Med. 2010;14:795–804. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1582-4934.2010.01031.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  99. Townsend L, Dyer AH, Jones K, Dunne J, Mooney A, Gaffney F, et al. Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0240784. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240784.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  100. Viruez-Soto A, Lopez-Davalos MM, Rada-Barrera G, Merino-Luna A, Molano-Franco D, Tinoco-Solorozano A, et al. Low serum erythropoietin levels are associated with fatal COVID-19 cases at 4,150 meters above sea level. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resp.2021.103709.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Wakhloo D, Scharkowski F, Curto Y, Javed Butt U, Bansal V, Steixner-Kumar AA, et al. Functional hypoxia drives neuroplasticity and neurogenesis via brain erythropoietin. Nat Commun. 2020;11:1313. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15041-1.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Wall EC, Wu M, Harvey R, Kelly G, Warchal S, Sawyer C, et al. Neutralising antibody activity against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs B.1.617.2 and B.1.351 by BNT162b2 vaccination. Lancet. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)01290-3.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  103. Wang EY, Mao T, Klein J, Dai Y, Huck JD, Jaycox JR, et al. Diverse functional autoantibodies in patients with COVID-19. Nature. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03631-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. Webb BJ, Peltan ID, Jensen P, Hoda D, Hunter B, Silver A, et al. Clinical criteria for COVID-19-associated hyperinflammatory syndrome: a cohort study. Lancet Rheumatol. 2020;2:e754–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2665-9913(20)30343-X.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium. Repurposed antiviral drugs for Covid-19 - Interim WHO solidarity trial results. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:497–511. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2023184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Wilkinson E. RECOVERY trial: the UK covid-19 study resetting expectations for clinical trials. BMJ. 2020;369:m1626. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.m1626.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. World Health Organization. Therapeutics and COVID-19: living guideline, 31 March 2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021a.

    Google Scholar 

  108. World Health Organization. WHO coronavirus (COVID-19) dashboard. 2021b. https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed 07 Sept 2021.

  109. Wüstenberg T, Begemann M, Bartels C, Gefeller O, Stawicki S, Hinze-Selch D, et al. Recombinant human erythropoietin delays loss of gray matter in chronic schizophrenia. Mol Psychiatry. 2011;16:26–36, 21. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2010.51

  110. Yagci S, Serin E, Acicbe O, Zeren MI, Odabasi MS. The relationship between serum erythropoietin, hepcidin, and haptoglobin levels with disease severity and other biochemical values in patients with COVID-19. Int J Lab Hematol. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijlh.13479.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  111. Yang AC, Kern F, Losada PM, Agam MR, Maat CA, Schmartz GP, et al. Dysregulation of brain and choroid plexus cell types in severe COVID-19. Nature. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03710-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  112. Yuan S, Peng L, Park JJ, Hu Y, Devarkar SC, Dong MB, et al. Nonstructural protein 1 of SARS-CoV-2 is a potent pathogenicity factor redirecting host protein synthesis machinery toward viral RNA. Mol Cell. 2020;80:1055-1066.e1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.034.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  113. Zhang L, Lin D, Sun X, Curth U, Drosten C, Sauerhering L, et al. Crystal structure of SARS-CoV-2 main protease provides a basis for design of improved alpha-ketoamide inhibitors. Science. 2020;368:409–12. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3405.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  114. Zhou P, Yang XL, Wang XG, Hu B, Zhang L, Zhang W, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature. 2020;579:270–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  115. Zhou D, Dejnirattisai W, Supasa P, Liu C, Mentzer AJ, Ginn HM, et al. Evidence of escape of SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.351 from natural and vaccine-induced sera. Cell. 2021;184:2348-2361.e2346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.02.037.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  116. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–33. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  117. Zubieta-Calleja G, Zubieta-Deurioste N, Venkatesh T, Das KK, Soliz J. COVID-19 and pneumolysis simulating extreme high-altitude exposure with altered oxygen transport physiology; multiple diseases, and scarce need of ventilators: andean Condor’s-eye-view. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2020;15:347–59. https://doi.org/10.2174/1574887115666200925141108.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

See funding. Otherwise not applicable.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. This work was supported by the Max Planck Society, the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) TRR 274/1 2020 - 408885537. KWM holds a 5-year Lundbeck Foundation Fellowship (Grant no. R215-2015-4121).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concept, design and drafting of the article: HE, MB, OG. Literature search, comments, and interpretation: MB, HE, RH, together with OG, DW, VDG, EV, KW, KWM, OM. Contribution and follow-up of cases: OG, DW, OM. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hannelore Ehrenreich.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript. Otherwise consent not applicable.

Competing interests

Authors report no conflict of interest related to this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Begemann, M., Gross, O., Wincewicz, D. et al. Addressing the ‘hypoxia paradox’ in severe COVID-19: literature review and report of four cases treated with erythropoietin analogues. Mol Med 27, 120 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-021-00381-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Recombinant human EPO
  • Darbepoetin
  • Neuroprotection
  • Treatment
  • Signaling
  • Critical care
  • Outcome