Skip to main content

Advertisement

  • Original Articles
  • Open Access

Inhibition of Protein Phosphatase 1 Stimulates Secretion of Alzheimer Amyloid Precursor Protein

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Molecular Medicine19951:BF03401590

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03401590

  • Published:

Abstract

Background

Aberrant metabolism of the Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein (APP) or its amyloidogenic Aβ fragment is thought to be centrally involved in Alzheimer’s disease. Nonamyloidogenic processing of APP involves its cleavage within the Aβ domain by a protease, termed α-secretase, and release of the large extracellular domain, termed APPS. Secretion of APPS can be stimulated by phorbol esters, activators of protein kinase C, with concurrent inhibition of Aβ production. While the role of protein kinases on APP metabolism has been investigated, considerably less effort has been devoted to elucidating the role played by protein phosphatases. Okadaic acid, a protein phosphatase inhibitor, has been shown to stimulate secretion of APPS, but the identity of the phosphatase involved has not been investigated.

Materials and Methods

The secretion of APPS from COS-1 cells was measured in the absence or presence of various doses of serme/threonine-specific phosphatase inhibitors. Quantitation of the derived IC50 values was used to determine the identity of the phosphatase involved in the control of APP secretion.

Results

The availability of protein phosphatase inhibitors with different relative potencies against the different types of serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatase allowed us to examine which of the four known types of protein phosphatase might be involved in the regulation of APP secretion. Both okadaic acid and calyculin A stimulated the secretion of APP from COS-1 cells in a dose-dependent manner. The half-maximal dose for stimulation of APP secretion was approximately 100-fold higher with okadaic acid than with calyculin A.

Conclusions

The nearly 100-fold difference in the observed IC50 values for okadaic acid and calyculin A implicates a type 1 protein phosphatase in the control of APPS production. Protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) is known to be highly expressed in adult mammalian brain, both in neurons and glia. The identification of a specific phosphatase type in the control of APP secretion opens new avenues to the development of rational therapeutic intervention strategies aimed at the prevention and/or treatment of Alzheimer’s Disease.

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most common of the neurodegenerative diseases, probably affecting more than 50% of individuals over the age of 80. Central to the pathology of the disease is the formation of senile plaques in the brains of affected individuals. The amyloid core of these plaques is comprised largely of a small 39–43 amino acid peptide (1), termed Aβ, derived from the Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein (APP). APP can also be processed via a nonamyloidogenic pathway by a protease (α-secretase) that cleaves APP within the Aβ domain and releases the large extracellular domain (APPS).

Previous work has shown that treatment of a variety of cells with phorbol esters stimulates the release of APPS, presumably via protein kinase C-mediated phosphorylation of a target protein (25). A similar effect can be obtained using okadaic acid (an inhibitor of serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatases), possibly via increased phosphorylation of the same target protein due to phosphatase inhibition. In addition, protein kinase C (PKC) was shown to phosphorylate the cytoplasmic domain of APP (6, 7) at a site that is also phosphorylated in vivo (M. Oishi and P. Greengard, unpublished observations). However, APPS secretion can still be stimulated by phorbol esters or okadaic acid in the absence of the cytoplasmic domain of APP (4, 5). Thus, although the identity of the target protein has not been elucidated, it is unlikely to be the APP protein itself. Phorbol ester stimulation of APPS secretion implicates PKC in APP processing. Likewise, the stimulation of APPS secretion by okadaic acid implicates a phosphatase. However, the question of which type of serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatase is involved in APP secretion has not been addressed previously.

Four major types of serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatase have been identified in eukaryotic cells (termed 1, 2A, 2B, and 2C), which can be distinguished by a variety of biochemical and enzymatic properties (reviewed in Ref. 8). Of the four types of protein phosphatases, PP1 and PP2A exhibit broad and overlapping substrate specificities in vitro, accounting for almost all measurable activity towards a variety of phosphoproteins regulating cellular processes. PP2B (also known as calcineurin) is active on a much more restricted range of substrates, and PP2C is structurally unrelated to the other types. Recent recombinant DNA approaches identified the existence of several isoforms for each phosphatase type and revealed that types 1, 2A, and 2B belong to a gene family distinct from that of phosphatase 2C. A number of“novel”phosphatases have also been identified in a variety of organisms, the first of which was termed protein phosphatase X (9).

A variety of compounds is now available capable of specifically inhibiting serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatases. Two of the best characterized are okadaic acid and calyculin A (10). Since they readily enter intact cells, they can be used to determine which phosphatase is active in a particular process by virtue of their different relative potencies against the various phosphatase types. In this study we have used them to identify the protein phosphatase involved in the control of APPS production. The data presented here were the subject of a preliminary report (11).

Materials and Methods

Materials

Calyculin A, okadaic acid, PDBu (phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate), Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM), and fetal bovine serum were obtained from Life Technologies Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD, U.S.A.). Cantharidin was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, U.S.A.). Murine monoclonal antibody 22C11, prepared against the amino terminus of APP (12), was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim Corporation (Indianapolis, IN, U.S.A.). Murine monoclonal antibody 6E10, whose epitope is located within residues 1–17 of Aβ, was obtained from Drs. H. M. Wisniewski and K. S. Kim (New York State Institute for Basic Research in Developmental Disabilities).

Cell Culture, Drug Treatment, and Detection of Secreted APP

COS-1 cells were grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C and 5% CO2. The cells were subcultured in triplicate into six-well plates and grown to confluency. After two washes with phosphate buffered saline, the cells were incubated in the absence or presence of varying concentrations of either PDBu (for 60 min) or the indicated phosphatase inhibitors (for 90 min). When a combination of drugs was used, the time of exposure was kept to 60 min. All drugs were prepared by diluting the stock solutions into serum-free DMEM. Following incubation as described above, the conditioned medium was collected into tubes containing SDS (1% final concentration), and boiled for 5 min. The samples, normalized for protein content (13), were subjected to SDS-Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on 7.5% gels (14). The separated proteins were then electrophoretically transferred onto nitrocellulose and probed with antibodies 22C11 or 6E10, as described in the figure legends. The immunoblots were washed and then incubated successively with rabbit anti-mouse IgG (Cappel, Durham, NC) and 125I-protein A (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL, U.S.A.). Immunoreactive bands were detected by autoradiography and quantitated using a Phosphorlmager (Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA, U.S.A.).

Results

Several previous studies showed that APP secretion can be stimulated in a variety of cells using phorbol esters. Indeed, in a previous report we demonstrated that PDBu (phorbol 12,13-dibutyrate) could stimulate the secretion of both endogenous APP and transfected wild-type and mutant APP expressed in COS-1 cells (4). In the present study, we have further characterized the control of secretion of endogenous APP from COS-1 cells in response to agents capable of modulating the state of phosphorylation of intracellular proteins. PDBu treatment of COS-1 cells was shown to stimulate secretion of endogenous APP in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1). The concentration of PDBu required for half-maximal effect (EC50) was approximately 50 nM (Table 1). We have previously reported the EC50 value for PDBu-stimulated processing of APP to be 17 nM in PC 12 cells, as measured by following the disappearance of mature intracellular APP using an antibody whose epitope lies in the C-terminal intracellular domain of APP (15). Thus, there is reasonable agreement between the two experimental systems, even though different parameters were measured and different cell types were used.
Fig. 1
Fig. 1

Stimulation of APP S production from COS-1 cells in response to PDBu treatment

Cells were treated with the PDBu concentrations indicated (10−9–10−6 M), and the APPS released into the medium was quantitated by immunoblotting with antibody 22C11. C, control without PDBu.

Fig. 2
Fig. 2

Stimulation of APP S production from COS-1 cells, in response to treatment with phosphatase inhibitors, measured with antibody 22C11

(A) Immunoblot analysis of COS-1 cells treated with the indicated concentrations of OA (10−9–10−6 M okadaic acid) or CA (10−10–10−7 M calyculin A; higher concentrations of calyculin A were toxic). C, control without drug treatment. (B) Quantitation of the dose response from several experiments. The values plotted are the mean ± SEM.

Table 1

Concentration of test substance required to achieve half-maximal secretion of APP S

Test Substance

EC50 (nM)

22C11

6E10

Okadaic Acid

80

110

Calyculin A

1

1

Cantharidin

500

ND

PDBu

54

ND

The range of concentrations used for each test substance was as follows: 10−10–10−6 M okadaic acid, 1011−10−7 M calyculin A, 10−9–10−5 M cantharidin, and 10−10−10−6 M PDBu. The amount of APP secreted into the medium was expressed as a percentage of the maximal amount, as exemplified in Fig. 2B. Immunoreactive bands were quantitated by immunoblotting using a Phosphorlmager. The drug concentration required to achieve half-maximal secretion of APP from COS-1 cells (EC50) was calculated from the average results obtained in several experiments, each performed in triplicate, and are tabulated above. ND, not determined.

APP secretion can be stimulated not only by activators of PKC, such as PDBu, but also by inhibitors of serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatases. Thus, okadaic acid was shown to stimulate APP secretion in PC12 cells (2) and in COS-1 cells (4). However, the identity of the phosphatase targeted by such inhibitors was not elucidated. The availability of other naturally occurring compounds that are cell permeable and act as specific inhibitors of certain of the serine/threonine-specific protein phosphatases has allowed us to investigate the nature of the phosphatase involved in the control of APP secretion. Both okadaic acid and calyculin A stimulated the production of APPS from COS-1 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2A). Quantitation of the results from several dose-response experiments using antibody 22C11 yielded average EC50 values of 80 and 1 nM for okadaic acid and calyculin A, respectively (Fig. 2B, Table 1). Since antibody 22C11 has been reported to cross-react with APP-related proteins (16, 17) and does not differentiate between α-secretase and β-secretase cleaved APPS, we sought to confirm and extend our results using a more specific antibody. Thus, using antibody 6E10, which specifically recognizes APPS produced by the α-secretase pathway, we obtained EC50 values of 110 and 1 nM for okadaic acid and calyculin A, respectively (Fig. 3, Table 1). Given the approximately 100-fold difference in the calculated EC50 values for okadaic acid and calyculin A, these results identify protein phosphatase 1 (PP1) as being the target of the phosphatase inhibitors used (see Discussion below), and therefore implicate it in the control of APP cleavage and secretion.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3

Stimulation of APP S production from COS-1 cells, in response to treatment with phosphatase inhibitors, measured with antibody 6E10

Cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of OA (10−9–10−6 M okadaic acid) or CA (10−10–10−7 M calyculin A). C, control without drug treatment.

Cantharidin, isolated from blister beetles, is a recently described phosphatase inhibitor (18, 19) thought to be the active ingredient in the purported aphrodisiac, “Spanish fly”. Cantharidin, like okadaic acid and calyculin A, was also capable of stimulating APPS production from COS-1 cells in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4A). In this case, the calculated EC50 was approximately 500 nM (Table 1). The higher EC50 value obtained for cantharidin in comparison with okadaic acid and calyculin A is in agreement with their relative in vitro phosphatase inhibitory potencies (Ref. 19 and E. F. da Cruz e Silva et al., manuscript in preparation). Using submaximal doses of PDBu (10−8 M) and cantharidin (10−7), an additive effect was measured (Fig. 4B); the use of maximally effective doses of both did not result in further stimulation of APPS production beyond the levels achieved with either drug alone (Fig. 4B and data not shown). These results are consistent with phorbol esters and phosphatase inhibitors affecting the state of phosphorylation of the same target protein via the activation of PKC or the inhibition of PP1.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4

Cantharidin stimulation of APP S production from COS-1 cells as measured with antibody 22C11

(A) Immunoblot analysis of the dose response using the indicated concentrations of cantharidin (10−8–10−5 M). C, control without cantharidin treatment. (B) Immunoblot analysis of APPS production in response to the indicated concentrations of PDBu and cantharidin (CT). -, absence of drug.

The evidence presented above indicating that PP1 regulates APPS production in COS-1 cells led us to examine these cells for the expression of PP1 The mammalian genome is known to contain at least three different genes encoding PP1 catalytic subunits, namely, PP1α, PP1β, and PP1γ (20, 21). PP1γ is known to undergo tissue-specific alternative splicing to generate two proteins differing solely at their extreme carboxyl termini. One of these, PP1γ1 is ubiquitously expressed in most tissues, whereas the other isoform, PP1γ2, is thought to be testis specific (20, 22). Previously described isoform-specific antibodies (22, 23) detected both PP1α andPP1γ1 in COS-1 cells (data not shown).

Discussion

The availability of several phosphatase inhibitors with different potencies against the various types of phosphatase allowed us to investigate the identity of the phosphatase involved in the control of APP secretion. Both okadaic acid and calyculin A are potent inhibitors of protein phosphatase types 1 and 2A, whereas PP2B is only inhibited at much higher concentrations and PP2C is essentially resistant to these compounds. However, while calyculin A is equally potent in vitro against purified PP1 and PP2A (IC50 = 1−2 nM), okadaic acid inhibits PP1 with an IC50 of 10–100 nM and PP2A with an IC50 of 0.5–1 nM (10, 24, 25). Thus, okadaic acid and calyculin A can be used to characterize which type of phosphatase is involved in a particular physiological process (e.g., Refs. 26 and 27). In our experiments, calyculin A was approximately 100-fold more potent than okadaic acid at stimulating APPS production (Figs. 2 and 3, Table 1). Thus, our data implicate a type 1 phosphatase in the control of APPS production. Furthermore, we have shown by immunoblotting that COS-1 cells express at least two of the known isoforms of PP1 (namely, PPla and PPly, which exhibit very similar sensitivity profiles to okadaic acid, calyculin A and cantharidin (E. F. da Cruz e Silva et al., manuscript in preparation). Given the dynamic nature of the protein phosphorylation process, and given that PP1 has been detected in all eukaryotic cells examined to date (including neurons and glia), it is likely that PP1 also regulates APPS production in other cell types. PP1 has been shown to be particularly enriched in brain compared with peripheral tissues, and the occurrence and distribution of known PP1 isoforms has been described in mammalian brain both by immunoblotting, immunocytochemistry, and in situ hybridization (22, 23).

Several neurotransmitters affect the physiological properties of neurons by regulating the phosphorylation state of PP1 inhibitor proteins (2830), hence affecting PP1 activity. For example, dopamine, by increasing intracellular cAMP levels and activating protein kinase A, causes the phosphorylation and activation of the PP1 inhibitor DARPP-32 (dopamine- and cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein, Mr 32,000 daltons) in the medium-sized spiny neurons of the neostriatum (28, 31). Conversely, glutamate, by increasing intracellular calcium levels and activating PP2B, causes the dephosphorylation and inactivation of DARPP-32 (32). The convergence of major neurotransmitter pathways (e.g., dopaminergic, glutamatergic, and GABAergic) on PP1 suggests a critical role for this phosphatase in mediating the actions of these neurotransmitters.

Defects in signal transduction-dependent regulation of APP cleavage may play a critical role in the pathogenesis of AD. For instance, deficits in both neurotransmission (33, 34) and PKC activity (3537) have been reported to be associated with AD. Consistent with this notion, the stimulation of APPS release in response to neurotransmitters and other first messengers known to act via PKC has been reported in several studies (e.g., Refs. 38 and 39). The possibility now arises that regulation of APP metabolism, including APPS release and Aβ formation, may also be modulated by neurotransmitters or first messengers whose receptors are linked to modulation of PP1 activity. The characterization of the protein kinases and phosphatases involved in the control of APP metabolism should facilitate the development of novel rational therapeutic intervention strategies for AD.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Drs. J. D. Buxbaum, S. E. Gandy, and A. C. Nairn for critical reading of the manuscript. This work was supported by U. S. Public Health Service Grant AG-09464. CTBVZ was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship from CNPq and by PICD from Universidade Estadual de Londrina (Brazil).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, The Rockefeller University, Box 296, 1230 York Avenue, New York, New York 10021, USA

References

  1. Glenner GG, Wong CW. (1984) Alzheimer’s disease: Initial report of the purification and characterization of a novel cerebrovascular amyloid protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 120: 885–890.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Caporaso GL, Gandy SE, Buxbaum JD, Ramabhadran TV, Greengard P. (1992) Protein phosphorylation regulates secretion of Alzheimer β/A4 amyloid precursor protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89: 3055–3059.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Gillespie SL, Golde TE, Younkin SG. (1992) Secretory processing of the Alzheimer amyloid β/A4 protein precursor is increased by protein phosphorylation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 187: 1285–1290.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. da Cruz e Silva OAB, Iverfeldt K, Oltersdorf T, et al. (1993) Regulated cleavage of Alzheimer β-amyloid precursor protein in the absence of the cytoplasmic tail. Neuroscience 57: 873–877.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Hung AY, Selkoe DJ. (1994) Selective ectodomain phosphorylation and regulated cleavage of β-amyloid precursor protein. E.M.B.O. J. 13: 534–542.Google Scholar
  6. Gandy SE, Czernik AJ, Greengard P. (1988) Phosphorylation of Alzheimer disease amyloid precursor protein peptide by protein kinase C and Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85: 6218–6221.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Suzuki T, Nairn AC, Gandy SE, Greengard P. (1992) Phosphorylation of Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein by protein kinase C. Neuroscience 48: 755–761.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Shenolikar S, Nairn AC. (1991) Protein phosphatases: Recent progress. Adv. Sec. Mess. Phosphoprot. Res. 23: 1–123.Google Scholar
  9. da Cruz e Silva OB, da Cruz e Silva EF, Cohen PTW. (1988) Identification of a novel protein phosphatase catalytic subunit by cDNA cloning. F.E.B.S. Lett. 242: 106–110.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ishihara H, Martin BL, Brautigan DL, et al. (1989) Calyculin A and okadaic acid: Inhibitors of protein phosphatase activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 159: 871–877.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. da Cruz e Silva OB, da Cruz e Silva EF, Greengard P. (1994) Role of protein phosphatase 1 in the metabolism of Alzheimer amyloid precursor protein. Soc. Neurosci. Abs. 20: 440.Google Scholar
  12. Weidemann A, Konig G, Bunke D, et al. (1989) Identification, biogenesis and localization of precursors of Alzheimer’s disease A4 amyloid protein. Cell 57: 115–126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Smith PK, Krohn RI, Hermanson GT, et al. (1985) Measurement of protein using bicinchoninic acid. Anal. Biochem. 150: 76–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Laemmli UK. (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680–685.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Buxbaum JD, Gandy SE, Cicchetti P, et al. (1990) Processing of Alzheimer β/A4 amyloid precursor protein: Modulation by agents that regulate protein phosphorylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 87: 6003–6006.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Wasco W, Bupp K, Magendantz M, Gusella JF, Tanzi RE, Solomon F. (1992) Identification of a mouse brain cDNA that encodes a protein related to the Alzheimer disease-associated amyloid beta protein precursor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89: 10758–10762.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Wasco W, Gurubhagavatula S, Paradis MD, et al. (1993) Isolation and characterization of APLP2 encoding a homologue of the Alzheimer’s associated amyloid beta protein precursor. Nature Genet. 5: 95–100.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Li YM, Casida JE. (1992) Cantharidin-binding protein: Identification as protein phosphatase 2A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89: 11867–11870.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Li YM, Mackintosh C, Casida JE. (1993) Protein phosphatase 2A and its [3H] cantharidin/[3H] endothall thioanhydride binding site. Inhibitor specificity of cantharidin and ATP analogues. Biochem. Pharmacol. 46: 1435–1443.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Sasaki K, Shima H, Kitagawa Y, Irino S, Sugimura T, Nagao M. (1990) Identification of members of the protein phosphatase 1 gene family in the rat and enhanced expression of protein phosphatase 1a gene in rat hepatocellular carcinomas. Jpn. J. Cancer Res. 81: 1272–1280.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. da Cruz e Silva EF, Greengard P. (1995) Cloning of neuronal isoforms of protein phosphatase 1 by low-stringency screening of cDNA libraries. Neuroprotocols 6: 2–10.Google Scholar
  22. da Cruz e Silva EF, Fox CA, Ouimet CC, Gustafson E, Watson SJ, Greengard P. (1995) Differential expression of protein phosphatase 1 isoforms in mammalian brain. J. Neuroscience 15: 3375–3389.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Ouimet CC, da Cruz e Silva EF, Greengard P. (1995) The α and γ1 isoforms of protein phosphatase 1 are highly and specifically concentrated in dendritic spines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92: 3396–3400.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Hescheld J, Mieskes G, Ruegg JC, Takai A, Trautwein W. (1988) Effects of a protein phosphatase inhibitor, okadaic acid, on membrane currents of isolated guinea-pig cardiac myocytes. Pfluegers Arch. 412: 248–252.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Bialojan C, Takai A. (1988) Inhibitory effect of a marine-sponge toxin, okadaic acid, on protein phosphatases. Specificity and kinetics. Biochem J. 256: 283–290.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Starke LC, Jennings ML. (1993) K-Cl co-transport in rabbit red cells: Further evidence for regulation by protein phosphatase type 1. Am. J. Physiol. 264: C118–C124.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Murata K, Sakon M, Kambayashi J, et al. (1993) The possible involvement of protein phosphatase 1 in thrombin-induced Ca2+ influx of human platelets. J. Cell. Biochem. 51: 442–445.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Walaas SI, Aswad DW, Greengard P. (1983) A dopamine- and cyclic AMP-regulated phosphoprotein enriched in dopamine-innervated brain regions. Nature 301: 69–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Snyder GL, Girault J-A, Chen JY, et al. (1992) Phosphorylation of DARPP-32 and protein phosphatase inhibitor-1 in rat choroid plexus: Regulation by factors other than dopamine. J. Neurosci. 12: 3071–3083.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Snyder G, Fisone G, Greengard P. (1994) Phosphorylation of DARPP-32 is regulated by GABA in rat striatum and substantia nigra. J. Neurochem. 63: 1766–1771.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hemmings Jr HC, Greengard P, Tung HYL, Cohen P. (1984) DARPP-32, a dopamine-regulated neuronal phosphoprotein, is a potent inhibitor of protein phosphatase-1. Nature 310: 503–505.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Halpain S, Girault J-A, Greengard P. (1990) Activation of NMDA receptors induces dephosphorylation of DARPP-32 in rat striatal slices. Nature 343: 369–372.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Davies P, Maloney AJF. (1976) Selective loss of central cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2: 1403.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Tomlinson BE, Corsellis JAN. (1984) Ageing and the dementias. In: Adams JH, Corsellis JAN, Duchen LW (eds). Greenfield’s Neuropathology. 4th Ed. John Wiley & Sons, New York, pp. 951–1025.Google Scholar
  35. Cole G, Dobkins KR, Hansen LA, Terry RD, Saitoh T. (1988) Decreased levels of protein kinase C in Alzheimer brain. Brain Res. 452: 165–174.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Huynh T, Cole G, Katzman R, Huang K-P, Saitoh T. (1989) Reduced protein kinase C immunoreactivity and altered protein phosphorylation in Alzheimer’s disease fibroblasts. Arch. Neurol. 46: 1195–1199.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Masliah E, Cole GM, Hansen LA, et al. (1991) Protein kinase C alteration is an early biochemical marker in Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 11: 2759–2767.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Buxbaum JD, Oishi M, Chen HI, et al. (1992) Cholinergic agonists and interleukin 1 regulate processing and secretion of the Alzheimer β/A4 amyloid precursor protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 89: 10075–10078.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Nitsch RM, Slack BE, Wurtman RJ, Growdon JH. (1992) Release of Alzheimer amyloid precursor derivatives stimulated by activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Science 258: 304–307.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Molecular Medicine 1995

Advertisement