Skip to main content

Nebulized in-line endotracheal dornase alfa and albuterol administered to mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients: a case series

Abstract

Background

Mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 have a mortality of 24–53%, in part due to distal mucopurulent secretions interfering with ventilation. DNA from neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) contribute to the viscosity of mucopurulent secretions and NETs are found in the serum of COVID-19 patients. Dornase alfa is recombinant human DNase 1 and is used to digest DNA in mucoid sputum. Here, we report a single-center case series where dornase alfa was co-administered with albuterol through an in-line nebulizer system.

Methods

Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic medical records of five mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19—including three requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation—treated with nebulized in-line endotracheal dornase alfa and albuterol, between March 31 and April 24, 2020. Data on tolerability and response were analyzed.

Results

The fraction of inspired oxygen requirements was reduced for all five patients after initiating dornase alfa administration. All patients were successfully extubated, discharged from hospital and remain alive. No drug-associated toxicities were identified.

Conclusions

Results suggest that dornase alfa will be well-tolerated by patients with severe COVID-19. Clinical trials are required to formally test the dosing, safety, and efficacy of dornase alfa in COVID-19, and several have been recently registered.

Background

Critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), progress to hypoxemic and then mixed respiratory failure, secondary to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (Marini and Gattinoni 2020; Greenland et al. 2020). Approximately 79–88% of patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with COVID-19 require intubation and mechanical ventilation, with a mortality of 24–53% (Cummings et al. 2020; Grasselli et al. 2020; Richardson et al. 2020; Docherty et al. 2020). ARDS in COVID-19 is characterized by respiratory failure, in part attributable to distally located mucopurulent secretions.

Dornase alfa (Pulmozyme®) is recombinant human DNase 1 and a safe mucolytic that is administered in nebulized form. It is FDA-approved in combination with standard therapies for patients with cystic fibrosis to improve sputum clearance and pulmonary function (Yang and Montgomery 2018). It is also used off-label as a mucolytic in other diseases, including ARDS (Morris and Mullan 2004; ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet] 2019). A mechanism by which dornase alfa might improve ventilation is by reducing the DNA-mediated viscosity of neutrophil-rich secretions (Papayannopoulos et al. 2011). There are multiple sources for the DNA in mucoid sputum, one of which is neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). Recently, we collaboratively reported that in the discarded serum of patients with COVID-19, the levels of NETs were increased and correlated with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), D-dimer, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (Zuo et al. 2020). Subsequently, NET-containing microthrombi and increased neutrophil-platelet infiltration in pulmonary autopsies from COVID-19 patients was reported (Becker 2020; Fox et al. 2020; Middleton et al. 2020; Schonrich et al. 2020; Tay et al. 2020; Varga et al. 2020; Leppkes et al. 2020). Notably, targeting NETs reduces mortality in animal models of acute lung injury (Barnes et al. 2020; Adrover et al. 2020; Caudrillier et al. 2012; Lefrancais et al. 2018; Thomas et al. 2012). Despite recognition that mucolytic treatment may be beneficial for patients with COVID-19 (12, (Earhart et al. 2020), administration of nebulized medications, such as dornase alfa, have been limited due to risk of viral aerosolization. If risk of viral aerosolization can be avoided, dornase alfa may benefit patients with severe COVID-19 by acting as a mucolytic and by reducing NET levels in the lungs, thereby improving oxygenation and ventilation. We report the clinical course, safety, and outcomes after nebulized in-line endotracheal dornase alfa treatment for five intubated and mechanically ventilated patients with PCR-confirmed COVID-19.

Methods

The Northwell Health institutional review board that focuses on COVID-19 research approved this case series as minimal-risk research using de-identified data from routine clinical practice. Data were collected from the enterprise health record (Sunrise Clinical Manager; Allscripts) reporting database, and included patient demographics, comorbidities, inpatient medications, laboratory studies, treatment, and outcomes. We further obtained longitudinal values of the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) and of the arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) as measures of respiratory function during treatment. Lung mechanics were assessed by obtaining mechanical power of the respiratory system (MP) and mean airway pressure (Paw). FiO2 values of the circuit were reported for those patients who required veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO). Ferritin, CRP, LDH, and D-dimer were obtained as measures of systemic disease and inflammation. Not all patients had laboratory investigations on the same days in relation to the nebulized and co-administered dornase alfa and albuterol (nDA + A) treatment. In the following case synopses, each measurement is therefore followed by the day in relation to the first day of treatment with nDA + A (e.g., d 2 for the second day of treatment with nDA + A or d − 1 for the day before nDA + A treatment was initiated). Relevant nDA toxicities (hoarseness, rash, hypersensitivity reactions and hemoptysis) were clinically monitored. Hoarseness was assessed post-intubation. Rash was assessed daily via physical exam. Hypersensitivity reactions were determined via physical exam, vital signs, and vasopressor requirements. Hemoptysis was assessed in intubated patients by endotracheal tube visual inspection.

Results

Five patients treated with dornase alfa between March 31, 2020 and April 24, 2020 were identified. These patients had met the Berlin criteria for ARDS and were treated with ventilator strategies guided by the ARDSNet protocol at North Shore University Hospital within Northwell Health (Durante et al. 2002). These patients had been treated with dornase alfa because they required high levels of FiO2 and had elevated ventilation demands. All patients received the same treatment doses: nebulized dornase alfa (2.5 mg) co-administered twice daily with the short-acting β2-agonist albuterol (2.5 mg) to improve delivery to the alveoli (referred to as nDA + A). Of note, β2-adrenoreceptor agonism may also inhibit NET formation by direct action on neutrophils (Marino et al. 2018). The treatment was administered with an Aerogen® Solo in-line nebulizer to avoid open aerosol generation, which would place staff at risk of exposure to SARS-CoV-2.

The patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Patients were treated with nDA + A between 3 to 25 days. The most common characteristics of the patients included obesity (BMI ≥ 30) and four of the patients had hypertension. Four patients received methylprednisolone dosed at 1-2 mg/kg/day. All patients were treated with full dose or prophylactic dose anticoagulation for thrombosis. All other medications that were administered during the course of hospitalization were considered standard of care (STC) at the time of treatment and are summarized in Table S1. No adverse events related to nDA + A treatment were observed for any of the patients throughout the duration of the study. The clinical course of the five patients treated with nDA + A is summarized in Fig. 1. Figures 2 and 3 display the longitudinal, ventilatory, and inflammatory markers for each patient.

Table 1 Patient data from five patients with COVID-19 who received dornase alfa with albuterol March–April, 2020
Fig. 1
figure1

Overview of the clinical course of five patients treated with nebulized dornase alfa + albuterol (nDA + A)

Fig. 2
figure2

Patient-level data of respiratory function during treatment with nebulized dornase alfa + albuterol (nDA + A). Values were extracted from the medical records the day before and up to the seven days after the initiation of treatment. Values are graphed in black for patients after they ceased nDA + A treatment. Dashed lines indicate patients on VV-ECMO. Not all markers were measured daily for every patient. FiO2: fraction of inspired oxygen; PaCO2: partial pressure of carbon dioxide

Fig. 3
figure3

Patient-level data of systemic disease during treatment with nebulized dornase alfa + albuterol (nDA + A). Values were extracted from the medical records the day before and up to the seven days after the initiation of treatment. Values are graphed in black for patients after they ceased nDA + A treatment. Dashed lines indicate patients on VV-ECMO. Not all markers were measured daily for every patient. CRP: C-reactive protein; LDH: lactate dehydrogenase

Patient 1 is a 56-year-old Hispanic woman who presented in respiratory distress. Her respiratory status deteriorated over 48 h, requiring intubation and transfer to the ICU. She was treated with nDA + A for 6 days, starting from day 10 of intubation. The FiO2 requirement decreased from 70% (d − 1) to 30% (d 6), PaCO2 from 58 (d − 1) to 37 mmHg (d 7), ferritin from 1803 (d − 1) to 472 ng/mL (d 6), and D-dimer from 1619 (d − 1) to 563 ng/mL (d 6). MP had increased from 16.48 (d − 1) to 20.91 J/minute (d 6), and Paw from 12 (d − 1) to 20 cmH2O (d 6). Minimal changes were noted in CRP and LDH. The patient underwent a tracheostomy after 23 days of endotracheal intubation and was able to be decannulated 19 days later. She was discharged to a rehabilitation facility after a total hospital stay of 82 days.

Patient 2 is a 34-year-old white man who presented to the hospital in diabetic ketoacidosis without prior history of diabetes mellitus. He was intubated on admission and initiated on VV-ECMO. He received nDA + A for 3 days and was de-cannulated after 12 days. No change in ECMO settings occurred during treatment time. The FiO2 requirement decreased from 100% (d 0) to 80% (d 3), MP from 36.38 (d 0) to 12.03 J/min (d 3), Paw from 36.38 (d 0) to 12.03 cmH2O (d 3), CRP from 14.14 (d 0) to 2.41 mg/dL (d 3), ferritin from 12,281 (d 0) to 5453 ng/mL (d 3), and D-dimer from 5210 (d 0) to 2099 ng/mL (d 3). Minimal changes were noted in PaCO2 and LDH. The patient was able to be extubated after 30 days of endotracheal intubation (VV-ECMO the first 12 days). He was discharged to a rehabilitation facility after a total hospital stay of 75 days.

Patient 3 is a 65-year-old Asian man who was admitted directly to the ICU for respiratory distress and intubated 3 days later. Twelve days after intubation, he was started on 9 days of nDA + A treatment. The FiO2 requirement decreased from 50% (d − 1) to 40% (d 7), PaCO2 from 55 (d 0) to 43 mmHg (d 6), and CRP from 22.07 (d 0) to 26.48 mg/dL (d 6). Minimal changes were noted in MP, Paw, ferritin, LDH, and D-dimer. He was extubated 1 day after the completion of the nDA + A course. Five days later, he was re-intubated for an additional 4 days due to mental status changes and failure to protect his airway. The patient was extubated in ICU care 30 days after his initial endotracheal intubation. He subsequently developed a right colonic and small bowel perforation requiring the placement of multiple drains. He required the initiation of total parenteral nutrition until he was able to tolerate enteral feeds. Surgery was never required. He was discharged to a rehabilitation facility after a total hospital stay of 97 days.

Patient 4 is a 31-year-old Hispanic man who was intubated and transferred to the ICU from the Internal Medicine service 2 days after presenting with respiratory distress. Nine days after intubation, he was initiated on VV-ECMO. Five days after cannulation, he was started on the nDA + A treatment. After ten days, he was de-cannulated and remained intubated for ten days while continuing the nDA + A treatment. No change in ECMO settings occurred during treatment time. He was then extubated and discharged to the floor. The FiO2 requirement decreased from 90% (d − 1) to 21% (d 7), Paw from 19 (d − 1) to 16 cmH2O (d 7), and LDH from 1054 (d − 1) to 451 U/L (d 7). Ferritin initially decreased from 1669 (d − 1) to 387 ng/mL (d 7). On day 15 of treatment, he developed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia and bacteremia. Ferritin thus increased to 1619 ng/mL (d 13) prior to decreasing to 555 ng/mL (d 19) with antibiotic treatment. Minimal changes were noted in MP, PaCO2, CRP, and D-dimer. He was transferred to an acute inpatient rehabilitation facility after a total hospital stay of 73 days.

Patient 5 is a 34-year-old black woman who was intubated at an outside hospital, then transferred to the North Shore University Hospital ICU. Two days later, she was cannulated for VV-ECMO. She required VV-ECMO for 24 days and was intubated for a total of 30 days. She was treated with nDA + A for 25 days starting on day 4 following cannulation for VV-ECMO. While on VV-ECMO for the first 5 days, CytoSorb therapy was applied. She was de-cannulated after 24 days, extubated after 4 days, and discharged to the floor. No change in ECMO settings occurred during treatment time. The FiO2 requirement fell from 80% (d − 1) to 40% (d 7), ferritin from 1244 (d − 1) to 535 ng/mL (d 7), and LDH from 844 (d − 1) to 693 U/L (d 7). MP increased from 11.03 (d − 1) to 20.08 J/minute (d 7), Paw from 15 (d − 1) to 22 cmH2O (d 7). Minimal changes were noted in PaCO2, CRP, and D-dimer. She declined rehabilitation therapy and was discharged home after a total hospital stay of 38 days.

Discussion

At the doses utilized, no nDA + A treatment-associated toxicities were identified. FiO2 requirements decreased for all five patients 7 days after nDA + A treatment was initiated, while measures of lung mechanics varied. All patients were discharged from the hospital and remain alive at the time of submission of this report. During the time period that these patients were treated, ~ 25% mortality was reported during the first month for patients requiring ICU care within our hospital system (Richardson et al. 2020). We recognize that changes in FiO2 levels, lung mechanics, and systemic inflammatory markers may be independent of the nDA + A treatment. Clinical trials are therefore required to test the dose range, safety, and efficacy of dornase alfa in patients with COVID-19 in this setting and possibly earlier in the disease course. Endpoints should include measurements of the effect on respiratory function and mechanics, as well as on systemic inflammation, coagulopathy, secondary infections, and the presence of NETs in plasma. Eight such trials were recently registered (NCT04359654, NCT04355364, NCT04432987, NCT04409925, NCT04445285, NCT04402944, NCT04402970, NCT04459325).

Although it is not yet clear whether nebulized dornase alfa will have any effect on blood NET levels or systemic inflammation in COVID-19, a reduction in systemic inflammatory markers has been reported after use of dornase alfa in patients with cystic fibrosis (Yang and Montgomery 2018). We did note a reduction in CRP in two patients (patients 2 and 3) and a reduction in D-dimer in two patients (patients 1 and 2) during nDA + A treatment. LDH was reduced for the patients on VV-ECMO during nDA + A treatment, and ferritin was reduced in four out of five patients. Due to the small sample size and the common occurrence of secondary infections in ventilated patients with COVID-19, we are unable to comment on any potential relationship between nDA + A administration and the risk of secondary infections.

Conclusions

This case report suggests that nebulized dornase alfa in combination with albuterol is a safe treatment option, supporting randomized, controlled clinical trials for mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS secondary to COVID-19, including for those on VV-ECMO—a patient population with an urgent, unmet need for effective therapies.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included within the article.

Abbreviations

ARDS:

Acute respiratory distress syndrome

BID:

Bis in die (twice daily)

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 2019

CRP:

C-reactive protein

d:

Day

FiO2 :

Fraction of inspired oxygen

gtt:

Guttae (intravenous drip)

ICU:

Intensive care unit

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

MRSA:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

nDA + A:

Nebulized dornase alfa plus albuterol

NETs:

Neutrophil extracellular traps

PaCO2 :

Arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide

SARS-CoV-19:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

VV-ECMO:

Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

References

  1. Adrover JM, Aroca-Crevillen A, Crainiciuc G, Ostos F, Rojas-Vega Y, Rubio-Ponce A, et al. Programmed 'disarming' of the neutrophil proteome reduces the magnitude of inflammation. Nat Immunol. 2020;21(2):135–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barnes BJ, Adrover JM, Baxter-Stoltzfus A, Borczuk A, Cools-Lartigue J, Crawford JM, et al. Targeting potential drivers of COVID-19: neutrophil extracellular traps. J Exp Med. 2020;217(6):e20200652.

  3. Becker RC. COVID-19 update: Covid-19-associated coagulopathy. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2020;50(1):54–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caudrillier A, Kessenbrock K, Gilliss BM, Nguyen JX, Marques MB, Monestier M, et al. Platelets induce neutrophil extracellular traps in transfusion-related acute lung injury. J Clin Invest. 2012;122(7):2661–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. ClinicalTrials.gov [Internet]. Identifier NCT03368092, inhaled Dornase alpha to reduce respiratory failure after severe trauma (TRAUMADORNASE). Bethesda: National Library of Medicine (US); 2019. 2017 Dec 11. [cited 2020 Apr 28]. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03368092.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cummings MJ, Baldwin MR, Abrams D, Jacobson SD, Meyer BJ, Balough EM, et al. Epidemiology, clinical course, and outcomes of critically ill adults with COVID-19 in new York City: a prospective cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1763–70.

  7. Docherty AB, Harrison EM, Hardwick HE, Holden KA, Dondelinger F, Mersen L, et al. Features of 20,133 UK patients in hospital with COVID-19 using the ISARIC WHO clinical characterisation protocol: prospective observational cohort study. BMJ. 2020;369:m1985.

  8. Durante G, Turco M, Rustichini L, Cosimini P, Giunta F, Hudson LD, et al. ARDSNet lower tidal volume Ventilatory strategy may generate intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165(9):1271–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Earhart AP, Holliday ZM, Hofmann HV, Schrum AG. Consideration of dornase alfa for the treatment of severe COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. New Microbes New Infect. 2020;35:100689.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fox SE, Akmatbekov A, Harbert JL, Li G, Quincy Brown J, Vander Heide RS. Pulmonary and cardiac pathology in African American patients with COVID-19: an autopsy series from New Orleans. Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8(7):681–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, Antonelli M, Cabrini L, Castelli A, et al. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of 1591 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy region, Italy. Jama. 2020;323(16):1574–81.

  12. Greenland JR, Michelow MD, Wang L, London MJ. COVID-19 infection: implications for perioperative and critical care physicians. Anesthesiology. 2020;132(6):1346–61.

  13. Lefrancais E, Mallavia B, Zhuo H, Calfee CS, Looney MR. Maladaptive role of neutrophil extracellular traps in pathogen-induced lung injury. JCI Insight. 2018;3(3):e98178.

  14. Leppkes M, Knopf J, Naschberger E, Lindemann A, Singh J, Herrmann I, et al. Vascular occlusion by neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. EBioMedicine. 2020;58:102925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marini JJ, Gattinoni L. Management of COVID-19 respiratory distress. JAMA. 2020;323(22):2329–30.

  16. Marino F, Scanzano A, Pulze L, Pinoli M, Rasini E, Luini A, et al. beta2 -Adrenoceptors inhibit neutrophil extracellular traps in human polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Leukoc Biol. 2018;104(3):603–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Middleton EA, He XY, Denorme F, Campbell RA, Ng D, Salvatore SP, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) contribute to Immunothrombosis in COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome. Blood. 2020;136(10):1169–79.

  18. Morris C, Mullan B. Use of dornase alfa in the management of ARDS. Anaesthesia. 2004;59(12):1249.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Papayannopoulos V, Staab D, Zychlinsky A. Neutrophil Elastase enhances sputum Solubilization in cystic fibrosis patients receiving DNase therapy. PLoS One. 2011;6(12):e28526.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes among 5700 patients hospitalized with COVID-19 in the new York City area. Jama. 2020;323(20):2052–9.

  21. Schonrich G, Raftery MJ, Samstag Y. Devilishly radical NETwork in COVID-19: oxidative stress, neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs), and T cell suppression. Adv Biol Regul. 2020;77:100741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Tay MZ, Poh CM, Renia L, MacAry PA, Ng LFP. The trinity of COVID-19: immunity, inflammation and intervention. Nat Rev Immunol. 2020;20(6):363–74.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Thomas GM, Carbo C, Curtis BR, Martinod K, Mazo IB, Schatzberg D, et al. Extracellular DNA traps are associated with the pathogenesis of TRALI in humans and mice. Blood. 2012;119(26):6335–43.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, Haberecker M, Andermatt R, Zinkernagel AS, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395(10234):1417–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang C, Montgomery M. Dornase alfa for cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;9:Cd001127.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zuo Y, Yalavarthi S, Shi H, Gockman K, Zuo M, Madison JA, et al. Neutrophil extracellular traps in COVID-19. JCI Insight. 2020;5(11):e138999.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thanks “The NETwork to Target Neutrophils in COVID-19,” Eric Gottesman, William Taylor, David Menon, and David Tuveson for helpful discussions, as well as the Northwell COVID-19 Research Consortium for facilitating the study.

Disclaimer

The initial characteristics of 5700 patients from Northwell Health are presented elsewhere (Richardson et al. 2020). This case series presented in-depth results on the clinical status of five patients treated with dornase alfa that were not presented in that article.

Funding

This work was supported by the William C. and Joyce C. O’Neil Charitable Trust. In addition, M.E. and T.J. are supported by NIH grant 5P30CA045508–30. B.J.B. is supported by NIH grant 1R01AR076242–01 and DOD LRP W81XWH-18-1-0674. A.S.C. was supported by The Primary Immune Deficiency Treatment Consortium (U54 AI 082973), funded jointly by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). The funding bodies had no role in the design of the study, in collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or in writing the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting of the manuscript: A.G.W., A.S.C., M.E., B.J.B., and T.J. Data acquisition: A.G.W. and B.J.B. The authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Authors’ information

Not applicable.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Mikala Egeblad or Betsy J. Barnes.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Northwell Health institutional review board that focuses on COVID-19 research approved this case series as minimal-risk research using de-identified data from routine clinical practice. Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from the participants or their health care proxies. The study has been registered as “Dornase Alfa Administered to Patients With COVID-19 (DACOVID)” at ClinicalTrials.gov with ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04387786.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

Mikala Egeblad is receiving lonodelestat from Santhera for preclinical studies, but has no financial relationship with Santhera. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Additional file 1 Supplemental Table 1.

Additional medications that dornase alfa+albuterol-treated COVID-19 patients received while in the hospital.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weber, A.G., Chau, A.S., Egeblad, M. et al. Nebulized in-line endotracheal dornase alfa and albuterol administered to mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients: a case series. Mol Med 26, 91 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-020-00215-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • SARS-CoV-2
  • COVID-19
  • Coronavirus
  • Mucopurulent secretions
  • Dornase alfa
  • Neutrophil extracellular traps
  • ARDS
  • VV-ECMO