- Research Article
- Open Access
Up-regulation of Rac1 by Epidermal Growth Factor Mediates COX-2 Expression in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomas
Molecular Medicine volume 13, pages143–150(2007)
Recurrent respiratory papillomas are epithelial tumors of the airway caused by human papillomaviruses. We previously reported that the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in papilloma cells, that cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) is induced, and that COX-2 expression in primary papilloma cells requires activation of the EGFR but not Erk. Rac1, a member of the Rho family of GTPases, is a key signaling element that is known to control multiple pathways downstream of the EGFR. Here we report that Rac1 is overexpressed in papilloma cells compared with normal laryngeal epithelial cells and that the increased levels of Rac1 are mediated by EGFR activation. Transfecting cells with Rac1-specific siRNA suppressed COX-2 expression. Surprisingly, Rac1 mediated phosphorylation of p38 mitogen-activated kinase in papilloma cells but not normal cells, and inhibition of p38 with the specific inhibitor SB202190 suppressed COX-2 expression in papilloma cells but had no effect on low-level COX-2 expression in normal cells. Thus, the signaling cascades that regulate COX-2 expression are different in HPV-infected papilloma cells, with a significant contribution by the EGFR → Rac1 → p38 pathway.
Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) is caused by human papillomaviruses (HPVs) (1). The papillomas are characterized by the growth of hyperplastic epithelial tissue with defects in regulation of growth and terminal differentiation (2) and resistance to apoptosis due to expression of survivin (3). We previously reported that papilloma cells overexpress the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (4,5), that multiple signal transduction pathways linked to the EGFR are altered in papilloma cells, and that these alterations contribute to the abnormal differentiation (4,6). The alterations include constitutive phosphorylation of Erks (5), elevated phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) activity but reduced activation of Akt and Stat-3 due to overexpression of the phosphatase PTEN (7,8), and increased activation of NF-κB (9). Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression is elevated in respiratory papilloma tissues and cultured cells, and COX-2 expression requires EGFR and PI3K activity (10). In tumor cell lines, COX-2 expression is regulated by multiple pathways, including activation of Erk, PI3K, and G-protein coupled receptors (11). However, the EGFR-Mek-Erk pathway plays no role in induction of COX-2 in papilloma cells (10), suggesting that one or more other pathways is involved in these cells. We postulated that a Rac1-dependent pathway might play this role.
Rac1 is a member of the Rho family of GTPases, which control multiple cell functions including cell cycle progression, gene expression, apoptosis, actin organization, cell motility, and the invasive potential of human tumor cells (1215). Rho GTPases act as switches, coordinating and integrating multiple pathways. Rac1 is regulated by the extent of binding of GTP. It is activated by guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEFs) that catalyze exchange of GDP for GTP and inactivated by GTPase-activating proteins (GAPs) that promote GTP hydrolysis. Notably, Rac1 protein levels are elevated in some tumors and tumor cell lines by an as yet undetermined mechanism, and the increase may contribute to signaling from activated Rac1 (16–18).
In this study, we found that Rac1 overexpression in papilloma cells is due to increased EGFR signaling and that Rac1 mediates induction of COX-2 in papilloma cells, in part through activation of p38. Furthermore, this is specific to papilloma cells, as the Rac1 → p38 → COX-2 pathway does not function in normal laryngeal cells.
Materials and Methods
Tissues and Cultured Cells
Laryngeal papillomas and normal tissues were obtained from surgical biopsies. The use of human tissues and cultured cells was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, North Shore-LIJ Health System, in accordance with an assurance filed with and approved by the Department of Health and Human Services. Informed consent for use of tissues for research was obtained from each subject or the subject’s guardian. Epithelial explant cultures of normal laryngeal cells and papilloma cells were established as previously described (19). Cells were trypsinized and plated at 1 × 105 cells/cm2 in serum-free KGM [keratinocyte basal medium (KBM) (Clonetics, San Diego, CA, USA) supplemented to a final concentration of 1 ng/mL EGF, 5 µg/mL insulin, 2 µg/mL transferrin, 0.5 µg/mL hydrocortisone, 10−9 M retinoic acid, 100 U/mL penicillin, and 100 µg/mL streptomycin]. Cells were used for experiments while just subconfluent.
For growth factor stimulation studies, cells were cultured in KGM without EGF or insulin for 24 h, and then fed with complete KGM containing either 20 ng/mL EGF or 5 µM insulin for 48 h before extraction. For inhibition studies, cells were preincubated with inhibitor for 1 h, fed with KBM containing inhibitor plus indicated growth factors for up to 48 h, and analyzed by Western blot for COX-2 and Rac1, steady-state levels of phospho-p38 and signal transduction intermediates, and by enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for PGE2. Inhibitors were 1 µM PD153035, a specific inhibitor of the EGFR tyrosine kinase; 50 µM PD98059, a selective inhibitor of MAP kinase kinase (MEK) that inhibits activation of Erk; 25 µM LY294002, a specific PI3K inhibitor; and 5 to 15 µM SB202190, a selective inhibitor of p38α and β. All inhibitors were from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA, USA). Control cells were incubated with KGM containing an equal concentration of DMSO, the solvent for the inhibitors. Experiments were done at least three times with cells derived from different patients unless otherwise noted.
Transfection of first-passage cells was done essentially as described by Chan et al. (14). Briefly, Rac-1-specific oligonucleotides corresponding to bp 439–459 after the start codon (5′-AAGGAGAUUG GUGCUGUAAAA-3′) and luciferase-specific oligonucleotides corresponding to bp 291–309 after the start codon of the GL2 luciferase gene (5′-AACGTACGCG GAATACTTCGA-3′) (Dharmacon, Lafayette, CO, USA) were used to generate small interfering RNA (siRNA) duplexes. Duplex oligonucleotides were diluted in KBM to a concentration of 1.25 µM, 50 mL mixed with 50 mL KBM plus 2 µL Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and incubated for 20 min at room temperature to allow complexes to form. Early passage cells, cultured in KGM in 16 mm2 wells until 60% to 80% confluent, were washed three times with PBS, and the oligonucleotide mixture was added to 200 µL KBM in the well. The cells were incubated at 37 °C for 6 h, 300 µL of complete KGM was added to the well (final concentration 104 nM), and the cells were incubated for an additional 72 h before assay.
Western Blot Analysis
Pulverized frozen tissues were extracted as previously described (8). Briefly, the powdered tissue was suspended in ice-cold hypotonic buffer [100 mM HEPES (pH 7.6), 10 mM KCl, 3 mM NaCl, 3 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM DTT, and 10% (vol/vol) glycerol plus complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Indianopolis, IN, USA)] and phosphatase inhibitors (20 mM β-glycerophosphate, 1 mM sodium orthovandadate, and 30 mM sodium fluoride). The extraction buffer for cultured cells contained 1% NP-40, 0.4 M NaCl, 1% glycerol, 1 µM dithiothreitol, and the protease/phosphatase inhibitors (6). Protein concentrations were determined by Micro BCA (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA). Proteins (30 µg) were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE and electroblotted onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH, USA), blocked with 5% dried milk, incubated with primary antibody overnight at 4°C, washed, and incubated with secondary antibody. Standard molecular weight markers (broad range, Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) were used for molecular weight estimation. The immunoreactive species were detected with Super Signal West Pico chemiluminescent substrates (Pierce). After detection, blots were stripped and reprobed sequentially with additional antibodies. Signal intensity was quantified by UN-SCAN-IT (Silk Scientific Inc., Orem, UT, USA), adjusted for total protein as determined by β-actin signal, and normalized to the control cells within each experiment. If bands were very faint, longer exposures than those shown were used for quantitation.
Primary antibodies were as follows: mouse monoclonal anti-Rac1 (Upstate, Temecula, CA, USA) at a dilution of 1:2000, anti-phospho-p38 and anti-p38 (BD Transduction Laboratories, San Diego, CA, USA) at dilutions of 1:500 and 1:1000, respectively, anti-COX-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at a dilution of 1:500, polyclonal goat anti-β-actin (Santa Cruz) at 1:1000, polyclonal rabbit anti-phospho-Akt and anti-Akt (Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) at dilutions of 1:500, and anti-Erk and anti-phospho-Erk (Cell Signaling) at dilutions of 1:500. Secondary antibodies were horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-goat, anti-mouse, and anti-rabbit IgGs (Pierce), all used at a dilution of 1:3000.
Measurement of PGE2 Levels
Cell culture medium from 1×105 normal laryngeal cells or papilloma cells was assayed by PGE2 EIA according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Amersham Biosciences, Piscataway, NJ, USA). We assayed 50-mL aliquots of each sample in triplicate. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm with an EL× 800 reader (Bio-Tek Instruments Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). Production of PGE2 was normalized to protein concentration.
Normal laryngeal and papilloma specimens were fixed in 10% buffered formalin, paraffin embedded, and processed for immunohistochemical staining by conventional methods. Sections were incubated with mouse monoclonal anti-Rac1 (Upstate) or with anti-phospho-p38 (BD Transduction Laboratories) at 1:50 dilution, washed with PBS, incubated with appropriate second antibody, detected by the avidin-biotin-complex (ABC) method with diaminobenzidine as chromogen (Vectastain ABC Elite Kit, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA), and counterstained with hematoxylin. Controls omitted the primary antibody.
Determination of Cell Proliferation and Cell Death
To measure the effect of p38 activation on cell number and spontaneous levels of apoptosis, papilloma cells cultured in KGM were treated for 48 h with 5, 10, or 15 µM SB202190 or an equal volume of DMSO, the solvent for the drug. The relative measure of viable cells was determined by bioreduction of a tetrazolium (MTT) compound (CellTiter 96 Non-Radioactive Cell Proliferation Assay, Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to manufacturer’s instructions. Apoptosis was measured by cytoplasmic release of nucleosomal fragments using a sandwich ELISA (Cell Death Detection ELISAPLUS, Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN, USA), detected photometrically with 2,2′-azino-di-3-ethylbenzthiazoline sulfonate as substrate.
The Student t test was used to determine statistical significance. Values were expressed as mean ± SD of multiple experiments, using tissues or cells from different patients. A difference between groups of P < 0.05 was considered significant.
We first asked whether Rac1 played a role in signal transduction pathways leading to the elevated level of COX-2 in papilloma cells, and the low level of COX-2 seen in normal laryngeal cells in culture. Knockdown of Rac1 protein with specific siRNA significantly reduced COX-2 expression and production of its downstream enzymatic product, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), in both normal and papilloma cells (Figure 1A). This result strongly suggested that Rac1 plays a central role in EGFR-mediated COX-2 expression in these cells.
Surprisingly, when we analyzed the cells treated with Rac1 siRNA by Western blot we saw elevated levels of Rac1 protein in papilloma cells compared with normal cells (see Figure 1B). Because Rac1 levels in vascular smooth muscle cells are regulated by receptor-mediated signaling pathways (20), and papilloma cells express high levels of the EGFR, we asked whether EGF stimulation would increase Rac1 levels. Stimulation of either normal or papilloma cells with 20 ng/mL EGF significantly increased Rac1 protein levels compared with baseline (*P < 0.05) (Figure 2). The basal level of Rac1 protein in the absence of growth factors was 3-fold higher in papilloma cells than in normal cells (*P < 0.01), and the stimulated levels in normal cells remained below the basal levels in papilloma cells. There was no change in expression of Rac1 in either type of cell after stimulation with insulin in the absence of EGF, suggesting that PI3K activity does not contribute to the regulation of Rac1 levels (data not shown). The EGFR inhibitor PD153035 reduced Rac1 levels in papilloma cells below the basal level, consistent with the heightened EGFR-induced signaling in papillomas cells by very low levels of ligands that are constitutively produced by these cells (5). In contrast, the inhibitor simply reduced Rac1 levels close to the basal level in normal cells.
Phosphorylation of p38, one of the potential downstream targets of Rac1, paralleled the levels of Rac1 expression in papilloma cells cultured with EGF (see Figure 2). The basal level of phosphorylated p38 in papilloma cells starved of growth factors was elevated more than three-fold compared with normal cells, further increased by EGFR stimulation (*P < 0.05), and reduced below the basal level by treatment with the EGFR inhibitor PD153035. Although EGFR stimulation modestly increased p38 activation in normal cells, the increase was barely significant and the EGFR inhibitor had no effect on basal activation. These findings suggest that the EGFR does not significantly contribute to p38 activation in normal cells.
We considered the possibility that the increases in Rac1 levels and p38 activation were artifacts of tissue culture, in which cells are normally grown in the presence of nonphysiologic levels of growth factors. We therefore compared Rac1 expression and phosphorylation of p38 in normal laryngeal epithelium and laryngeal papillomas by Western blots, as well as by immunohistochemical staining to visualize Rac1 and phospho-p38 distribution. There was a significant increase in both Rac1 protein level (*P < 0.05) and phospho-p38 (*P < 0.01) in papilloma tissues in vivo (Figure 3A). Therefore, the observed increases were not due to tissue culture conditions. Rac1 was abundant in both the basal and spinous layers of the papilloma tissues, and phospho-p38 staining was especially pronounced in the basal and lower and mid-spinous layers, with nuclear staining clearly evident in the basal cells (see Figure 3B). This distribution paralleled the distribution of elevated levels of the EGFR in papilloma cells (4), supporting a role for heightened EGFR signaling in vivo in the overexpression of Rac1 and its activation of downstream targets.
Because changes in Rac1 levels paralleled the extent of phosphorylation of p38, we asked specifically whether Rac1 was upstream of p38 phosphorylation. Rac1 siRNA markedly reduced the phosphorylation of p38 (*P < 0.05) in papilloma cells (Figure 4). In contrast, there was no suppression of p38 phosphorylation when normal cells were transfected with Rac1 siRNA. Rather, there was a small but significant and reproducible increase in p38 phosphorylation and a small but insignificant increase in total p38. These results suggest that Rac1 may modestly suppress p38 activation in normal laryngeal keratinocytes and that the regulation of COX-2 by Rac1 in normal cells is not mediated through activation of p38. Phosphorylation of p38 in papilloma cells was dependent primarily on EGFR → Rac1 signaling. Inhibition of PI3K with LY294002, or blocking Erk activation with PD98059, had no effect on phospho-p38 levels (see Figure 4B). Based on the results of these studies, we conclude that at least one of the EGFR-activated signal transduction pathways downstream of Rac1 that mediates COX-2 expression is different in papilloma cells than in normal cells.
Finally, we investigated whether p38 activation was required for COX-2 expression. Inhibition of p38-α and p38-β activity with SB202190, which also inhibits p38 phosphorylation (21), suppressed COX-2 levels in papilloma cells (Figure 5A), and inhibited both COX-2 expression and PGE2 synthesis in a dose-dependent manner (see Figure 5B). However, inhibiting these 2 p38 isoforms had no effect on COX-2 levels in normal cells (see Figure 5A). This result was consistent with the finding that reduction of Rac1 did not affect p38 activation. The inhibitor did suppress phosphorylation of Akt and Erk in normal cells as well as in papilloma cells. This finding could reflect either direct interaction of these pathways, because p38 can directly contribute to phosphorylation of Akt in some cells (22), or indirect effects on other transcription factors because the cells were treated with inhibitor for 48 h. In either case, p38 signaling does function in normal cells. These results clearly implicate EGFR → Rac1 → p38-α/β signaling as an important contributor to COX-2 expression in HPV 6/11-infected papilloma cells but not in normal laryngeal epithelial cells.
Activation of p38 can have either proapoptotic or antiapoptotic effects on cells, depending on the cell type and interactions with other signaling pathways. We had previously reported that treating papilloma cells with celecoxib, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, reduced proliferation and increased apoptosis (10). Because p38 activation increased COX-2 levels in papilloma cells, but also contributed to activation of both Erk and Akt, we investigated whether inhibiting p38-α/β with SB202190 would enhance or decrease papilloma cell survival. Incubating these cells with SB202190 significantly reduced the number of metabolically active cells and enhanced spontaneous apoptosis in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 5C). Therefore, we conclude that activation of p38 is primarily prosurvival and is likely to contribute to the resistance to apoptosis of HPV-infected papilloma cells.
The mechanism of induction of COX-2 varies among different cell types. We previously reported that overexpression of COX-2 in papillomas is a consequence of both EGFR and PI3K signaling. However, COX-2 expression in papilloma cells, unlike most tumor lines, does not require Erk signaling (10). Thus, we reasoned that at least one other signaling pathway mediated the EGFR/PI3K induction of COX-2 in these cells. Our studies have now shown for the first time that Rac1 plays an important role in mediating COX-2 expression in HPV-infected papilloma cells, acting in part through p38-α/β, and that the elevated levels of Rac1 in these cells are due to EGFR signaling.
Rac1 transduces signals from both the EGFR and PI3K in other cell types (23, 24, 25), consistent with their contribution to COX-2 expression in papilloma cells (10). Slice et al. (25) reported that signaling by small GTPases results in COX-2 expression in 3T3 cells through independent, parallel signaling pathways. Our results suggest that Rac1 mediates COX-2 expression through multiple pathways, and that HPV infection alters the downstream pathway(s) regulating COX-2 expression. Clearly, the low level expression of COX-2 in uninfected cells uses different Rac1 effectors from papilloma cells. Knockdown of Rac1 reduced the expression of COX-2 but not p38 phosphorylation in normal cells, and inhibiting p38 had no effect on COX-2 expression. Reducing Rac1 levels in papilloma cells had a greater effect on COX-2 levels than on p38 phosphorylation. Phosphorylation of p38 in papilloma cells required both Rac1 and EGFR activity but not PI3K, suggesting that an EGFR-specific Rac1 GEF mediates this pathway. Tiam1 is one such GEF, acting downstream of Ras and independent of PI3K in 3T3 cells and 293T cells (26). One or more other GEFs may mediate Rac1-dependent COX-2 expression from PI3K. Further studies will be needed to determine whether specific GEFs function differently upstream of Rac1 in papilloma and normal cells.
The different Rac1 pathways can also induce COX-2 through different mechanisms; p38 can elevate COX-2 levels by modifying posttranscriptional mRNA stability (27,28), whereas other signaling elements that function downstream of Rac1, such as NF-κB, directly increase COX-2 transcription (29). Therefore, the elevated level of COX-2 expression in papilloma cells may reflect the sum of the use of both mechanisms.
The differences in Rac1 signaling in the two cell types could result simply from elevated levels of Rac1 protein in papilloma cells, thereby altering interactions with downstream effectors. Studies are ongoing to determine the molecular mechanism for this overexpression. Clearly, EGFR signaling increases Rac1 levels in vitro, and EGFR signaling is enhanced in papilloma cells in vitro (5). A similar process may mediate increased Rac1 levels in papilloma tissues in vivo, because the EGFR is highly overexpressed and EGFR signaling, as indicated by Erk phosphorylation, is constitutively active (5). Alternatively, the activation of p38 by Rac1 in papilloma cells could reflect the effect of one or more HPV 6/11 proteins altering multiple intracellular protein interactions, as has been described for HPV 16 (30,31). Future studies will directly address this question, determining whether knockdown of HPV mRNAs affects both Rac1 levels and signaling pathways.
Activation of the different MAP kinases can either enhance or suppress apoptosis, depending on the cell type, the specific kinase, and the cell environment (32). Although the activation of p38 in papilloma cells is generally considered “proapoptotic”, we have shown that it leads to increased cell viability. This effect could be due to the induction of COX-2, the activation of Akt by p38, or a combination of the two mechanisms. Our previous studies showed that inhibiting COX-2 reduced papilloma cell viability (10). The overexpression of PTEN in papilloma cells suppresses Akt activation by PI3K (7). Activation of an Rac1-p38-Akt pathway could compensate for PTEN suppression and enhance viability. The result of increased viability would be enhanced growth of the papillomas. Our present studies suggest that Rac1 or p38 signaling may present a new source of drug targets for therapeutic treatment of recurrent respiratory papillomatosis and other HPV-induced diseases.
Gissman L, Diehl B, Schults-Coulon J, zur Hausen H. (1982) Molecular cloning and characterization of human papillomavirus DNA derived from a laryngeal papilloma. J. Virol. 44:393–9.
Steinberg BM, Meade R, Kalinowski S, Abramson AL. (1990) Abnormal differentiation of human papillomavirus-induced laryngeal Papillomas. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 116:1167–71.
Poetker DM, Sandler AD, Scott DL, Smith RJ, Bauman NM. (2002) Survivin expression in juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 111: 957–61.
Vambutas A, Di Lorenzo TP, Steinberg BM. (1993) Laryngeal papilloma cells have high levels of epidermal growth factor receptor and respond to epidermal growth factor by a decrease in epithelial differentiation. Cancer Res. 53:910–14.
Johnston D, Hall H, DiLorenzo TP, Steinberg BM. (1999) Elevation of the epidermal growth factor receptor and dependent signaling in human papillomavirus-infected laryngeal Papillomas. Cancer Res. 59:968–74.
Wu R, Sun S, Steinberg BM. (2003) Requirement of STAT3 activation for differentiation of mucosal stratified squamous epithelium. Mol. Med. 9:77–84.
Zhang P, Steinberg BM. (2000) Overexpression of PTEN/MMAC1 and decreased activation of Akt in human papillomavirus-infected laryngeal Papillomas. Cancer Res. 60:1457–62.
Sun S, Steinberg BM. (2002) PTEN is a negative regulator of STAT3 activation in human papillomavirus-infected cells. J. Gen. Virol. 83:1651–8.
Vancurova I, Wu R, Miskolci V, Sun S. (2002) Increased p50/p50 NF-kappaB activation in human papillomavirus type 6- or type 11-induced laryngeal papilloma tissue. J. Virol. 76:1533–6.
Wu R, Abramson AL, Shikowitz MJ, Dannenberg AJ, Steinberg BM. (2005) Epidermal growth factor-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression is mediated through phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase, not mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase, in recurrent respiratory Papillomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 11:6155–61.
Subbaramaiah K, Dannenberg AJ. (2003) Cyclooxygenase 2: a molecular target for cancer prevention and treatment. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 24:96–102.
Tolkacheva T, Feuer B, Lorenzi MV, Saez R, Chan AM. (1997) Cooperative transformation of NIH3T3 cells by G alpha12 and Rac1. Oncogene 15:727–35.
Kim BC, et al. (1998) Rac GTPase activity is essential for EGF-induced mitogenesis. Mol. Cells 8:90–5.
Chan AY, et al. (2005) Roles of the Rac1 and Rac3 GTPases in human tumor cell invasion. Oncogene 24:7821–9.
Guo F, Debidda M, Yang L, Williams DA, Zheng Y. (2006) Genetic deletion of Rac1 GTPase reveals its critical role in actin stress fiber formation and focal adhesion complex assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 281:18652–9. Epub 2006 May 11.
Schnelzer A, et al. (2000) Rac1 in human breast cancer: overexpression, mutation analysis, and characterization of a new isoform, Rac1b. Oncogene 19:3013–20.
Kaempchen K, Mielke K, Utermark T, Langmesser S, Hanemann CO. (2003) Upregulation of the Rac1/JNK signaling pathway in primary human schwannoma cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 12:1211–21.
Iwadate Y, et al. (2004) Molecular classification and survival prediction in human gliomas based on proteome analysis. Cancer Res. 264:2496–501.
Steinberg BM, Abramson AL, Meade RP. (1982) Culture of human laryngeal papilloma cells in vitro. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 90:728–35.
Laufs U, et al. (2003) Down-regulation of Rac-1 GTPase by estrogen. J. Biol. Chem. 278:5956–62.
Davies SP, Reddy H, Caivano M, Cohen P. (2000) Specificity and mechanism of action of some commonly used protein kinase inhibitors. Biochem. J. 351:95–105.
Rane MJ, et al. (2001) p38 Kinase-dependent MAPKAPK-2 activation functions as 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase-2 for Akt in human neutrophils. J. Biol. Chem. 276:3517–23. Epub 2000 Oct 20.
Hess JA, Ross AH, Qiu RG, Symons M, Exton JH. (1997) Role of Rho family proteins in phospholipase D activation by growth factors. J. Biol. Chem. 272:1615–20.
Marcoux N, Vuori K. (2003) EGF receptor mediates adhesion-dependent activation of the Rac GTPase: a role for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase and Vav2. Oncogene 22:6100–6.
Slice LW, Bui L, Mak C, Walsh JH. (2000) Differential regulation of COX-2 transcription by Ras-and Rho-family of GTPases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 276:406–10.
Lambert JM, et al. (2002) Tiam1 mediates Ras activation of Rac by a PI(3)K-independent mechanism. Nature Cell Biol. 4:621–25.
Jang BC, et al. (2000) Serum withdrawal-induced post-transcriptional stabilization of cyclooxygenase-2 mRNA in MDA-MB-231 mammary carcinoma cells requires the activity of the p38 stress-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 275:39507–15.
Subbaramaiah K, Marmo TP, Dixon DA, Dannenberg AJ. (2003) Regulation of cyclooxgenase-2 mRNA stability by taxanes: evidence for involvement of p38, MAPKAPK-2, and HuR, J. Biol. Chem. 278:37637–47. Epub 2003 Jun 25.
Inoue H, Tanabe T. (1998) Transcriptional role of the nuclear factor kappa B site in the induction by lipopolysaccharide and suppression by dexamethasone of cyclooxygenase-2 in U937 cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 244:143–8.
Zwerschke W, Jansen-Durr P. (2000) Cell transformation by the E7 oncoprotein of human papillomavirus type 16: interactions with nuclear and cytoplasmic target proteins. Adv. Cancer Res. 78:1–29.
Thomas M, Massimi P, Navarro C, Borg JP, Banks L. (2005) The hScrib/Dlg apico-basal control complex is differentially targeted by HPV-16 and HPV-18 E6 proteins. Oncogene 24:6222–30.
Wada T, Penninger JM. (2004) Mitogen-activated protein kinases in apoptosis regulation. Oncogene 23:2838–49.
We thank Dr. Allan Abramson and Dr. Mark Shikowitz for providing the tissues, and May Nouri for her assistance with establishment of the primary cultures. This work was supported by grant P50 DC00203 from the National Institute on Deafness and Communication Disorders, and a grant from the Frankfort Family Foundation.
About this article
Cite this article
Wu, R., Coniglio, S.J., Chan, A. et al. Up-regulation of Rac1 by Epidermal Growth Factor Mediates COX-2 Expression in Recurrent Respiratory Papillomas. Mol Med 13, 143–150 (2007). https://doi.org/10.2119/2007-00005.Wu