Skip to main content

Rab31-dependent regulation of transforming growth factor ß expression in breast cancer cells

Abstract

Background

The small GTP-binding protein Rab31 plays an important role in the modulation of tumor biological-relevant processes, including cell proliferation, adhesion, and invasion. As an underlying mechanism, Rab31 is presumed to act as a molecular switch between a more proliferative and an invasive phenotype. This prompted us to analyze whether Rab31 overexpression in breast cancer cells affects expression of genes involved in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-like processes when compared to Rab31 low-expressing cells.

Methods

Commercially available profiler PCR arrays were applied to search for differentially expressed genes in Rab31 high- and low-expressing CAMA-1 breast cancer cells. Differential expression of selected candidate genes in response to Rab31 overexpression in CAMA-1 cells was validated by independent qPCR and protein assays.

Results

Gene expression profiling of key genes involved in EMT, or its reciprocal process MET, identified 9 genes being significantly up- or down-regulated in Rab31 overexpressing CAMA-1 cells, with the strongest effects seen for TGFB1, encoding TGF-ß1 (> 25-fold down-regulation in Rab31 overexpressing cells). Subsequent validation analyses by qPCR revealed a strong down-regulation of TGFB1 mRNA levels in response to increased Rab31 expression not only in CAMA-1 cells, but also in another breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-231. Using ELISA and Western blot analysis, a considerable reduction of both intracellular and secreted TGF-ß1 antigen levels was determined in Rab31 overexpressing cells compared to vector control cells. Furthermore, reduced TGF-ß activity was observed upon Rab31 overexpression in CAMA-1 cells using a sensitive TGF-ß bioassay. Finally, the relationship between Rab31 expression and the TGF-ß axis was analyzed by another profiler PCR array focusing on genes involved in TGF-ß signaling. We found 12 out of 84 mRNAs significantly reduced and 7 mRNAs significantly increased upon Rab31 overexpression.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that Rab31 is a potent modulator of the expression of TGF-ß and other components of the TGF-ß signaling pathway in breast cancer cells.

Background

Rab-GTPases of the large Ras superfamily of small GTP-binding proteins are key regulators of membrane vesicle trafficking, membrane targeting and fusion in eukaryotic cells (Goud and Gleeson 2010; Stenmark 2009). Up to now, more than 60 different human Rab proteins have been identified, and a growing number of Rab and Rab-related proteins has been functionally characterized (Homma et al. 2020; Pylypenko et al. 2018; Singan et al. 2012). The importance of Rab pathways for intracellular transport processes becomes apparent by their involvement in a number of diseases, such as immunodeficiencies, neurological disorders, and cancer progression, attributed to dysregulation of Rab protein function (Cheng et al. 2005; Chia and Tang 2009; Mitra et al. 2011; Pan et al. 2016; Tzeng and Wang 2016).

Rab31 (also known as rab22B) belongs to the Rab-II supergroup, which encompasses 9 human members. It is ubiquitously expressed in normal human tissue (Bao et al. 2002; Kloepper et al. 2012) and is mainly localized in the trans-Golgi network and endosomes (Bao et al. 2002; Ng et al. 2007; Rodriguez-Gabin et al. 2001). In these cellular compartments, it regulates vesicle transport from the Golgi apparatus to early and late endosomes, e.g. the transport of mannose-phosphate receptors (Rodriguez-Gabin et al. 2009), or in retrograde transport from the plasma membrane into late endosomes, e.g. in case of the EGF receptor (EGFR) (Chua and Tang 2015). Rab31 silencing inhibits trafficking of EGR-bound EGFR to the late endosomes, and, thus, may prolong EGFR signaling. Contrariwise, Rab31 overexpression enhances EGFR trafficking to late endosomes resulting in an enhanced degradation of the receptor (Chua and Tang 2015).

Dysregulated expression of Rab31 has been observed in benign conditions, such as skin diseases, but is also involved in multiple aspects of tumor progression in various types of cancer, including breast, ovarian, cervical and liver cancer as well as glioblastoma (for a review see [Kotzsch et al. 2016]). In breast cancer tissue, Rab31 was reported to be strongly up-regulated (Kotzsch et al. 2008). Elevated Rab31 mRNA transcript levels were significantly associated with shorter distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival in a cohort of 280 untreated, lymph node-negative breast cancer patients. Since Rab31 mRNA independently contributed to the base multivariate models, it may serve as a prognostic marker of disease recurrence (Kotzsch 2008). In addition, the C-terminal subunit of mucin-1 (MUC1-C), in concert with estrogen receptor α (ERα), was identified to activate Rab31 gene expression in breast cancer, whereby Rab31 upregulation, in turn, results in elevated MUC1-C levels, most likely by reducing its lysosomal degradation. In line with these observations, Rab31 and MUC1-C are co-expressed in ER + tumor tissues (Jin et al. 2012). Subsequently, protein expression of Rab31 and mucin-1 was analyzed in tumor tissue extracts of ER + breast cancer and was found to be correlated with patients’ prognosis (Kotzsch et al. 2017). These results strongly suggest that, in ER + breast cancer patients, high Rab31 antigen levels in tumor tissue are associated with a high proliferative status, and Rab31 is an independent biomarker for poor prognosis (Kotzsch et al. 2017).

Using breast cancer cell transfectants displaying different Rab31 mRNA expression levels, the modulatory role of Rab31 in tumor biologically-relevant processes was investigated. Increased Rab31 protein levels were associated with enhanced proliferation of breast cancer cells, reduced cell adhesion and decreased invasive capacity in vitro and in vivo (Grismayer et al. 2012). These results suggest that Rab31, depending on its expression levels, is involved in controlling the interchange between a proliferative and an invasive phenotype.

This proposed function of Rab31 to act as a molecular switch between proliferation and invasion as well as its ability to affect the activity of receptors of important signaling pathways, such as ER or EGFR, raised the question whether Rab31 may modulate the expression of other tumor-associated factors in these processes. Cell proliferation, adhesion, motility and invasion are strongly associated with the developmental program of the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Originally identified as a program during embryonic development in which cells undergo dynamic changes from epithelial to mesenchymal phenotypes, it became clear that EMT-like processes are driving cancer progression as well. Many different variations of cancer-associated EMT-like programs exist and, thus, cannot be strictly and accurately defined by specific sets of markers (Yang et al. 2020). It is reasonable to assume that some of the genes previously linked to EMT-like processes may also play a role in the effects mediated by Rab31 in breast cancer cells.

In the present study, we used an EMT profiler PCR array which quantifies expression of key genes involved in EMT or its reciprocal process mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET), to analyze whether Rab31 overexpression in breast cancer cells affects expression of some of those genes compared to Rab31 low-expressing cells. We identified TGFB1 as the most strongly regulated gene in ER + CAMA-1 breast cancer cells (> 25-fold down-regulation in Rab31 overexpressing cells). The relationship between Rab31 expression and the TGF-ß signaling axis was further underscored by the identification of several other genes encoding members of the TGF-ß signaling pathway, which are also controlled by the Rab31 expression level in CAMA-1 cells.

Methods

Culture of adherent cells

The human breast adenocarcinoma cell lines CAMA-1 and MDA-MB-231 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were grown in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM; Gibco BRL, Eggstein, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS; Gibco BRL) and 10 mM HEPES (Gibco BRL; complete medium). Cell transfection with the Rab31 expression vector pRcRSV-Rab31 and the vector control pRcRSV, respectively, and selection of transfectants was performed as previously described (Grismayer et al. 2012).

3D cell culture

QGel (QGel, Ecublens VD, Switzerland), a synthetic polyethylene glycol (PEG)-based hydrogel matrix, mimics key features of the natural extracellular microenvironment of cells in vivo and provides a microenvironment for in vitro 3D cell culture. Hydrogels were prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions (QGel). Briefly, one vial of QGel powder was reconstituted with 400 µl of buffer A. Then, 1 × 105 cells were added to the reconstituted hydrogel in 100 µl phenol red-free complete medium and mixed for 10 s. Droplets (30 µl) of the precursor solution were pipetted on Sigmacote (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany; [Ehrbar et al. 2007]) coated glass slides with two 1.5 mm spacers and covered with a second glass slide. For polymerization, droplets were incubated for 45 min at 37 °C. Subsequently, phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH 7.4) was applied between the slides to moisten and lift the hydrogel discs for transfer into 48-well plates with complete medium. After 4 h at 37 °C the medium was changed. During 3D cell culture (14 days), the medium was changed every three days. Proliferation analysis of Rab31-transfected and vector cells was performed using both AlamarBlue and CyQuant-based assays as previously described (Loessner et al. 2016).

Preparation of cell lysates and supernatants

Adherent CAMA-1 and MDA-MB-231 cells were detached and washed with PBS. Cell pellets were disrupted by two freezing and thawing cycles, followed by solubilization of Rab31 antigen in lysis buffer (20  mM Tris–HCl, 125 mM NaCl, pH 7.6, containing 1% [v/v] Triton X-100, and the “Complete” protease inhibitor cocktail, Sigma-Aldrich). After incubation for 60 min on ice, lysates were centrifuged at 2000×g for 10 min at 4 °C, the supernatant was collected and used directly for further experiments or frozen at −20 °C. Prior to TGF-ß Western blot analyses, ELISA and activity assays, cell culture supernatants were concentrated 16-fold in a spin column (10,000 MW cut off, Vivaspin 6; Sartorius Stedim, Göttingen, Germany) via centrifugation at 4500×g at 4 °C. The total protein content in lysates and supernatants was determined using the BCA Protein Assay Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Thermo Scientific, Dreieich, Germany).

Western blot analysis

Proteins were separated by electrophoresis on 12% (w/v) polyacrylamide gels (SDS-PAGE), and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Immobilon; Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA) in either a semi-dry or a wet blotting device (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). After blotting, membranes were washed once in Tris-buffered saline (TBS), pH 7.4, containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20 (TBS-T), and incubated for blocking in TBS-T, containing 5% (w/v) dried skimmed milk for 60 min at room temperature (RT), followed by overnight incubation with a polyclonal Rab31-directed rabbit antibody (RT3-IgG; [Grismayer et al. 2012]) or with a polyclonal goat antibody directed against the so called latent-associated protein (LAP) domain of human TGF-ß1 (R&D Systems Wiesbaden, Germany), diluted in blocking buffer. After washing with TBS-T, the secondary peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or rabbit anti-goat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Lab, West Grove, PA) diluted in TBS-T, containing 1% (w/v) milk powder was applied for 60 min at RT followed by three washes with TBS-T. Proteins were visualized by a chemiluminescent reaction using ECL reagents or Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate according to the manufacturers' recommendations (Thermo Scientific).

Rab31 ELISA

The Rab31 antigen concentration in cell lysates was determined using a sandwich ELISA format as described previously (Grismayer et al. 2012; Kotzsch et al. 2017). Briefly, 96-well plates (MaxiSorp™; Nunc, Wiesbaden, Germany) were coated overnight with monoclonal antibody M01 (Novus Biologicals, Wiesbaden, Germany) diluted in coating buffer (15 mM Na2CO3, 33 mM NaHCO3, pH 9.6). After washing twice with washing buffer (PBS, containing 0.5% [v/v] Tween 20, pH 7.6), plates were blocked with blocking solution (washing buffer containing 2% [v/v] neonatal calf serum; Gibco BRL) for 30 min at 37 °C. Thereafter, plates were incubated with cell lysates diluted in sample buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, 100 mM NaCl, 0.2% [v/v] Triton X-100, 1% [w/v] bovine serum albumin [BSA], pH 7.6) for 90 min at 37 °C. Two-fold serial dilutions of Rab31-His protein (Grismayer et al. 2012) in sample buffer covering a concentration range of 0.15 to 5 ng/ml were used as standard antigen. After washing, plates were incubated with polyclonal antibody RT3-IgG (Grismayer et al. 2012) for 90 min at 37 °C followed by incubation with secondary peroxidase-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (Novus Biologicals) for 60 min at 37 °C. Finally, plates were washed and the peroxidase reaction was initiated by addition of 3,3’,5,5’-tetramethylbenzidine/H2O2 (TMB; K & P Laboratories, Gaithersburg, MD). After 20 min at RT, the reaction was stopped by addition of 0.5 M H2SO4, and the optical density was measured at 450 nm using a multichannel microplate reader (SLT Spectra, Salzburg, Austria). Absorbance values were converted into ng/ml of Rab31 using the standard curve as reference. The Rab31 concentration is expressed as ng Rab31 per mg of total protein content (ng/mg) of cell lysates.

Immunocytochemistry

For immunofluorescence analysis, 2 × 104 cells per well were seeded in human fibronectin-coated (5 µg/ml; BD-Bioscience, Bedford, MA) 8-well chamber glass slides (Permanox-type Lab-Tek slides; Nunc, Roskilde, Denmark) and grown overnight. Cell monolayers were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS, pH 7.4, for 15 min at RT, washed once with PBS and permeabilized using 0.025% (w/v) saponin in PBS. For blocking, cells were incubated with PBS, containing 2% (w/v) BSA for 30 min at RT. Thereafter, cells were probed with polyclonal rabbit anti-Rab31 antibody C15 (Santa Cruz, Heidelberg, Germany) diluted in PBS containing 1% (w/v) BSA for 90 min at RT. After washing, cells were incubated with the secondary, fluorochrome-coupled polyclonal antibody (goat anti-rabbit-Alexa Fluor 488 IgG; Life Technologies, Darmstadt, Germany), diluted in PBS containing 1% BSA for 45 min at RT in the dark. After final washings with PBS, cells were mounted in PBS and fluorescence intensity was evaluated by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM; Zeiss Axio Observer Z1, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). In order to convert fluorescence staining intensity into colors, the look-up table “glowOv/Un LUT” provided with the CLSM scanning software (Zeiss, black edition, version 7.0). Negative control staining was done with the secondary Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated IgG only.

TGF-β1 ELISA

TGF-ß1 concentration in cell lysates and cell culture supernatants was determined using an ELISA kit (R&D Systems) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This ELISA has been broadly used to measure TGF-ß1 protein levels not only in cell supernatants but also in cell extracts (Schmidt et al. 2002; Barsotti et al. 2013; Manokawinchoke et al. 2019). To activate latent TGF-ß1 to its immunoreactive form, cell lysates or culture supernatants were acidified with 1 M HCl prepared in 0.5 M HEPES for 10 min at RT, followed by neutralization with 1.2 M NaOH in 0.5 M HEPES.

TGF-ß activity assay

To measure active TGF-ß, embryonic fibroblasts derived from TGF-ß-deficient mice, and stably transfected with an expression plasmid encoding for the secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) under the control of a Smad2-responsive promoter were used (MFB-F11 cells; [Beaufort et al. 2014; Broekelmann et al 2020; Johnston et al. 2017; Tesseur et al. 2006). A density of 2 × 104 MFB-F11 cells per well were seeded in 96-well plates (Corning Inc., Corning, NY) and grown for 24 h at 37 °C. After washing with PBS, cells were serum-starved in FCS-free DMEM for 2 h at 37 °C. Concentrated supernatants of CAMA-1 cells (see above) or concentrated fresh culture medium (negative control) were either left untreated or were heated for 10 min at 80 °C to activate TGF-β. Supernatants were added to MFB-F11 cells in two volumes of FCS-free DMEM and incubated for 20 h at 37 °C. Samples were collected and SEAP was measured using a chemiluminescence detection kit (Great EscAPe SEAP; Clontech, Mountain View, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

RNA isolation

Total RNA of transfected CAMA-1 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells was prepared using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) in combination with the QIAcube (Qiagen) fully automated spin column system according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA concentration and purity were determined using the Nano Drop ND1000 (Peqlab, Erlangen, Germany) spectrophotometer with the Nano Drop software (Fisher Scientific, Mannheim, Germany). RNase-free water (Qiagen) was used as blank solution.

RT2 profiler PCR arrays

RNA (input of total RNA: 1.0 µg per reaction) was reverse transcribed using the RT2 First-Strand kit (Qiagen). Subsequently, profiler array-based quantitative PCR analysis was performed, following the instructions of the supplier, using the RT2 SYBR Green PCR Mastermix (Qiagen) and primer pre-coated RT2 Profiler PCR array plates (Qiagen) encompassing 84 pathway-focused genes per plate. Two different human-specific profiler PCR arrays were screened: pathways related to EMT signaling and the TGF-β/bone morphogenic protein (BMP), each on two independent biological replicates.

Quantitative PCR

For quantification of mRNA expression levels of individual genes, total RNA was isolated from at least 3 independent biological replicates and reverse transcribed using the cloned AMV first-strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Invitrogen, Darmstadt, Germany) and random hexamer primers according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The generated cDNA was diluted 1:5 with RNase-free water to an estimated final cDNA concentration of 10 ng/µl. The Brilliant III QPCR Master Mix with low ROX (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) in combination with FAM-labeled probes and primers (Life Technologies) and the Stratagene Mx3005P qPCR System (Agilent Technologies) were used for qPCR quantification of RAB31, TGFB1 and HPRT1. The expression levels of RAB31 and TGFB1, respectively, were normalized to the housekeeping gene hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase 1 (HPRT). The concentration of cDNA per qPCR run was 30 ng. For validation of the expression levels of the candidate genes identified in the TGF-ß1/BMP pathway profiler array screen, qPCR was performed using Universal Probe-Libray Probes (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), Brilliant III Ultra-Fast SYBR Green Low ROX Mastermix (Agilent Technologies) and 25 ng cDNA as template. Here, expression levels of the target genes were normalized to 18S RNA expression, using 18S-specific primers and a Universal Probe Library probe.

Statistical analyses

Data were analyzed for statistical significance using the Mann–Whitney U-test using the StatView 5.0 statistical packet (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Differences with P-values ≤ 0.05 were considered as statistically significant (*). P-values ≤ 0.01 and ≤ 0.001 were marked (**) and (***), respectively.

Results

Rab31 overexpression in CAMA-1 breast cancer cells leads to increased proliferation of microtumor-like spheroids

The effects of Rab31 overexpression were analyzed in a 3D spheroid model, which more closely mimics the in vivo tumor microenvironment compared to classical 2D cell monolayer cultures. For this, we used CAMA-1 cells, which form spheroids within hydrogel-based 3D cell culture. Rab31 expression in cells which were transfected with a Rab31 expression plasmid or the vector alone was characterized by Western blot analysis (Fig. 1A), ELISA (Fig. 1B), or immunofluorescence (Fig. 1C). Whereas vector control cells do not—or only to a very little extent—express Rab31, upon transfection with the plasmid pRcRSV-Rab31, Rab31 protein expression is distinctly up-regulated. Still, overexpression of Rab31 is within the physiological range because normal platelets display a Rab31 concentration of about 5 ng/mg total protein (Bao et al. 2002). Our ELISA measurements showed a concentration of about 4 ng/mg total protein in CAMA-1 cells (Fig. 1B).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Characterization of CAMA-1 breast cancer cells stably transfected with a Rab31 expression vector. CAMA-1 breast cancer cells were stably transfected with either the plasmid pRcRSV-Rab31 or with the vector alone. A Western blot analysis. GAPDH expression served as loading control. B Rab31 antigen levels in cell culture lysates, determined by ELISA. At least three experiments were performed in triplicates each. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by an asterisk. C Immunocytochemical analysis of Rab31. Rab31 protein expression is presented in white in the upper panels. The lower panels show transmission images of the cells. Magnification: 20×

When grown in 3D cell culture conditions, Rab31 overexpressing CAMA-1 cells form much larger spheroids than vector-transfected control cells (Fig. 2A), indicating an increased Rab31-dependent cell proliferation rate. In fact, applying both an AlamarBlue assay, that measures the metabolic activity and reflects the number of viable cells, and a CyQuant assay, that is based on determination of the DNA content and indicative of cell proliferation, Rab31 overexpression induced cell proliferation not only in 2D cell monolayers (Grismayer et al. 2012) but also in 3D spheroids (Fig. 2B).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Spheroid formation and proliferation analysis of CAMA-1 Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells. A Both CAMA-1 Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells formed spheroids in 3D culture, whereby Rab31 overexpressing cells resulted in much larger spheroids indicating a distinctly increased growth rate compared to vector control cells (p < 0.001). B Viable cells continuously convert the non-fluorescent substrate AlamarBlue into a fluorescent product (left panel), thereby allowing a quantitative measurement of cell numbers. Since the same cell number was plated out, Rab31 overexpressing cells display a faster growth rate as compared to vector control cells after 14 days. In the CyQuant assay (right panel), the content of DNA is measured by a non-fluorescent substrate, which upon intercalation into genomic DNA exhibits a strong fluorescence. The CyQuant proliferation assay of CAMA-1 cells shows a higher DNA content in Rab31 overexpressing as compared to vector control cells after 14 days, indicating a faster growth rate of Rab31 overexpressing cells. For both the AlamarBlue and the CyQuant assay a representative experiment of three independently performed biological replicates is depicted

Identification of differentially expressed genes in Rab31 overexpressing cells

Next, we tested whether Rab31 overexpression in CAMA-1 cells affects expression of other genes involved in EMT-like processes when compared to Rab31 low-expressing vector controls. For initial screening, we used a profiler PCR array (Human EMT RT2 Profiler PCR Array; Qiagen), which profiles expression of 84 key genes that are involved in EMT or its reciprocal process MET, for Rab31 overexpressing and vector control CAMA-1 cells using two independently generated biological replicates. The cut-off value for significant differential expression was set to > twofold up- or down-regulation. Five genes (WNT11, BMP7, TGFB2, TIMP1, and TGFB1) were identified as significantly downregulated in Rab31 overexpressing cells in both experiments, whereas four genes (TFPI2, VCAN, STEAP1, and PLEK2) were consistently upregulated (Table 1). The strongest effects were seen for TGFB1, encoding TGF-ß1, displaying a > 25-fold down-regulation in Rab31 overexpressing cells compared to vector controls.

Table 1 Differentially expressed EMT-related candidate genes in Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells identified by profiler PCR array analysis

Validation of differential TGF-β1 mRNA expression in Rab31 overexpressing cells

In order to validate downregulation of TGFB1 gene expression in response to Rab31 overexpression in CAMA-1 cells, TGF-ß1 (and Rab31) mRNA levels were quantified by an independent qPCR assay (TaqMan gene expression assay; Life Technologies). Again, a strong more than 20-fold downregulation of TGFB1 gene expression was observed in response to increased Rab31 expression (Fig. 3A). In addition to CAMA-1 cells, we also analyzed a second breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 4), which expresses higher basal Rab31 protein levels compared to CAMA-1 cells. In MDA-MB-231 cells, stable transfection of the Rab31 expression plasmid pRcRSV-Rab31 resulted in expression levels of about 2.5 ng/mg total protein (Fig. 4B), which reflects a fivefold increased protein level compared to vector control MDA-MB-231 cells. Quantitation of Rab31 and TGF-ß1 mRNA levels again showed that overexpression of Rab31 leads to a significant downregulation of TGF-ß1 mRNA expression in MDA-MB-231 (Fig. 3B), albeit to a lower extent than observed in CAMA-1 cells.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Rab31 and TGF-ß1 mRNA expression in Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells. Relative Rab31 and TGF-ß1 mRNA expression levels, normalized to the HPRT1 mRNA expression levels, in CAMA-1 (A) and MDA-MB-231 (B) breast cancer cells, respectively. Three experiments were performed in triplicates each. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by an asterisk

Fig. 4
figure 4

Characterization of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells stably transfected with Rab31. MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells were stably transfected with either the plasmid pRcRSV-Rab31 or with the vector alone. A Western blot analysis. In addition to vector control cells, the Western blot shows two independently selected Rab31-overexpressing MDA-MB-231 cell clones. Clone 2 was used for all further experiments described in the manuscript. GAPDH expression served as loading control. B Rab31 antigen levels in cell culture lysates, determined by ELISA. At least three experiments were performed in triplicates each. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by an asterisk. C Immunocytochemical analysis of Rab31. Rab31 protein expression is presented in white in the upper panels. The lower panels show transmission images of the cells. Magnification: 20×

Analysis of TGF-β1 protein expression and activity in Rab31 high- versus low-expressing cells

In order to evaluate TGF-ß1 regulation by Rab31 overexpression at the protein level, total TGF-ß1 antigen levels were assessed in whole cell lysates using an ELISA-based approach. We found considerably reduced TGF-ß1 protein levels in both CAMA-1 and MDA-MB-231 Rab31-overexpressing cells, which was more pronounced in the CAMA-1 cells (Fig. 5A). In parallel, total TGF-ß1 levels were determined in cell culture supernatants by ELISA (Fig. 5B) and by Western blot, using an antibody directed to both pro-TGF-ß1 and LAP, which corresponds to the pro-domain of TGF-ß1 (Fig. 6). Again, we found distinctly lower secreted TGF-ß1 levels in Rab31 overexpressing cells.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Relative TGF-ß1 antigen levels in cell culture supernatants and cell lysates from Rab31 low and high expressing cells. Cells were grown for 48 h or 72 h in FCS-free medium. TGF-β1 antigen levels from cell lysates (A) or from cell culture supernatants (B) were determined by ELISA and normalized to the total protein content of the respective sample. Three experiments were performed in triplicates each. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by an asterisk

Fig. 6
figure 6

Western blot analysis of TGF-ß1 in cell culture supernatants of Rab31 low- and high-expressing cells. Concentrated cell culture supernatants (concentration factor 1:16; the total protein content of the supernatants was used for normalization) of CAMA-1 (A) or MDA-MB231 (B) Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells, respectively, were reacted with a TGF-ß1 specific antibody. The signals obtained match the expected size for pro-TGF-ß1 and its cleavage product LAP, respectively

Since neither ELISA nor Western blot analyses using antibodies directed to mature TGF-ß were sensitive enough to detect active TGF-ß1, we used a highly sensitive, cell-based bioassay (Fig. 7A) that allows detection of human TGF-ß levels as low as 1 pg/ml versus 31.2 pg/ml by the ELISA approach (Beaufort et al. 2014; Broekelmann et al. 2020; Johnston et al. 2017; Tesseur et al. 2006). Concentrated supernatants from CAMA-1 Rab31 and vector transfectants were left untreated to measure active TGF-ß levels or heated to 65 °C to activate the pool of latent TGF-β in order to allow the determination of the total TGF-ß content. In line with the results obtained by ELISA and Western blot analyses, lower total TGF-ß levels were detected in the supernatants from Rab31 overexpressing cells when compared to vector controls. Similarly, active TGF-ß levels were strongly reduced upon Rab31 overexpression (Fig. 7B).

Fig. 7
figure 7

TGF-ß activity assays of cell culture supernatants from Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells. A Outline of the human TGF-ß activity assay. Concentrated supernatants (1:16) from CAMA-1 Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells, were added to murine TGFB1−/− fibroblasts transfected with a TGF-ß reporter plasmid. This plasmid encodes secreted alkaline phosphatase (SEAP) under the control of SMAD-binding elements (SBE). SEAP activity is then determined by a chemiluminescent reaction. B CAMA-1 cell culture supernatants were heat-activated to measure total TGF-ß levels (left panel), or left untreated to measure active TGF-ß levels (right panel). Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by an asterisk

Identification of further differentially expressed genes using a TGF-ß/BMP signaling profiler array

To further illuminate the relationship between Rab31 expression and the TGF-ß signaling axis, another profiler PCR array was selected (Human TGF-ß/BMP RT2 Profiler PCR Array; Qiagen) focusing on a panel of genes related to TGF-ß signaling including TGF-ß superfamily ligands and receptors, transcription factors (e.g. SMADs) and TGF-ß targets. Following the strategy applied for the initial screen using the EMT-related profiler PCR array, CAMA-1 cells were examined twice using independently generated biological replicates. Here, 12 out of 84 mRNAs were at least twofold reduced and 7 mRNAs were > twofold increased upon Rab31 overexpression in both experiments (Table 2). Three genes, TGFB1, TGFB2, and BMP7, are included in both the EMT (Table 1) and TGF-ß1/BMP (Table 2) profiler PCR array and were identified as differentially regulated candidates in both arrays. Whereas TGFB1 and TGFB2 were down-regulated upon Rab31 overexpression, expression of TGFB3 (present on the TGF-ß1/BMP array only) was not affected.

Table 2 Differentially expressed TGF-ß pathway-related candidate genes in Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells identified by profiler PCR array analysis

Validation of differential mRNA expression of selected candidates in Rab31 overexpressing cells

To validate differential expression of selected candidates in Rab31 overexpressing and vector control CAMA-1 cells, we applied independent qPCR assays (using Roche Universal Probe Library probes). These assays use different probes and primers than those used in the profiler PCR arrays. In addition to TGFB1, the following 9 genes were selected: TGFB2, BMP7, SMAD6, FSTL3 and MYC, which represent candidates for downregulation, and TNFS10, B2M, FAS and LEFTY, representing potentially upregulated genes upon Rab31 overexpression (Table 2). Of these candidate genes, 7 (TGFB1, TGFB2, BMP7, SMAD6, FSTL3, TNFSF10 and B2M) were at least twofold differentially expressed (Fig. 8; see also genes indicated in bold in Table 2). In case of MYC and LEFTY, even after 40 cycles no PCR product was detected using the TaqMan system, which either may indicate that these candidate genes represent false-positive genes within the profiler PCR array screen or the TaqMan assay is not sensitive enough to show differential expression. FAS was only slightly upregulated (about 1.4-fold) and does not meet the criterion of at least twofold difference in the mRNA levels between Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells to represent a differentially expressed gene. Overall, these data clearly demonstrate that TGF-ß expression levels and related proteins involved in the TGF-ß signaling pathway are—at least in part—under the control of Rab31 in a dose-dependent manner.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Validation of differential gene expression in Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells. A Validation of the significant, more than twofold, down-regulation of the five genes TGFB1, TGFB2, FSTL3, BMP7, and SMAD6 in Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells. B Quantitative determination of the B2M, FAS, and TNFSF10 mRNA levels CAMA-1 cells. The significant, more than twofold up-regulation of the genes B2M and TNFSF10 in Rab31 overexpressing and vector control cells is in line with the profiler PCR array analyses (see Table 2). In case of FAS, although significant, only an approx. 1.4-fold increase is observed in Rab31 overexpressing over vector control cells. In all cases, except for TNFSF10, the mRNA levels from vector control cells were set to 100% and the relative mRNA levels in the corresponding Rab31 overexpressing cells was calculated accordingly. For TNFSF10 expression, the mRNA levels of Rab31 overexpressing cells were set to 100%. All samples were normalized to HPRT1 expression level. Three experiments were performed in triplicates each. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.05) are indicated by an asterisk

Discussion

The members of the Rab protein family are distributed within distinct cellular compartments and represent major regulators of vesicle trafficking in many fundamental processes (Homma et al. 2020). In the activated state, Rab proteins promote downstream signaling by interacting with various effector proteins (Zhen and Stenmark 2015). Rab5 cycling between the GTP and GDP forms may influence the length and intensity of TGF-ß/activin signaling cascades (Panopoulou et al. 2002). Dysregulated expression of Rab-coding genes leads to distinct variations in biological functions and diseases (Krishnan et al. 2020). In cancer, Rab proteins contribute either to the suppression or promotion of tumor development, growth and metastasis. To this end, elevated Rab31 expression in breast cancer tissue is associated with poor patient prognosis (Kotzsch et al. 2008, 2017) and affects several tumor-relevant processes: increased Rab31 expression in breast cancer cells leads to enhanced proliferation concomitant with reduced cell adhesion and decreased invasion. (Grismayer et al. 2012). Knockdown of Rab31 expression in glioblastoma cells suppressed tumor growth in a nude mouse model (Pan et al. 2016). Although various pathways have been proposed for Rab31-induced cell proliferation (Tang et al. 2018; Yu et al. 2019), the exact mechanism of how Rab31 modulates tumor growth remains elusive. In the present study, we extended the analyses of the Rab31 effects on breast cancer cell proliferation using a 3D cell culture model. 3D cell culture systems are miniaturized tumor tissue/microtumor-like models that allow the growth of spheroids and recapitulate the physico-chemical properties of the cell–cell and cell–matrix interactions that occur in patient tissues (Hutmacher et al. 2010). These aspects contrast conventional 2D systems, which are limited by a uniform monolayer of cells cultured on a plastic surface. The simplistic 2D cell culture does not provide the multiple stimuli nor recapitulate the complexity of interactions that characterize the tumor microenvironment, and therefore, are determinant for the selection of a suitable 3D approach. We found that Rab31 overexpressing cells did not only exhibit increased proliferation rates but led also to the formation of larger spheroids as compared to control cells over 14 days. This new result is in line with our previously reported proliferation data using a conventional 2D system, in which Rab31 also enhanced cell proliferation over 3–4 days. The advantages of our herein reported hydrogel-based 3D assay are that it is not only better representing the tumor microenvironment but also allows for long-term measurements of cell behavior (e.g., spheroid formation, proliferation, metabolic activity).

Tumor growth and metastasis are characterized by uncontrolled cell proliferation, adhesion and invasion (Ribatti et al. 2020). These cell functions are strongly associated with both EMT and its reciprocal process MET. MET occurs in various stages of embryogenesis and is also used by cancer cells to establish micro-metastases and secondary lesions (Thiery 2009). However, the understanding of the events required to regulate EMT/MET-like processes in metastasis is still limited. A number of Rab-GTPases have been shown to regulate cancer-associated EMT-like programs. As such, overexpression of Rab25 contributed to bladder cancer metastasis through the induction of EMT (Zhang et al. 2013). Studies using Rab3D knockdown or overexpression in breast cancer cells strongly suggest that this Rab-GTPase regulates EMT via the activation of the Akt/GSK-3β/Snail pathway (Yang et al. 2015). Moreover, small GTPases play essential roles in TGF-ß-induced actin remodeling and cytoskeleton rearrangement, which facilitate processes like EMT (Kardassis et al. 2009; Ungefroren et al. 2018).

Previously, we reported that EMT/MET-associated cell functions (cell proliferation, adhesion, and invasion) are influenced by the Rab31 expression level (Grismayer et al. 2012). Here, we used a profiler PCR array system to assess the regulation of genes involved in EMT/MET in Rab31 overexpressing CAMA-1 breast cancer cells versus the respective vector transfectants displaying only low endogenous Rab31 levels. We identified 9 differentially expressed genes, with the gene encoding TGF-ß1 displaying the most pronounced difference (> 25-fold downregulation in Rab31-overexpressing versus control cells). Because most of the other candidate genes have been associated with the TGF-ß signaling pathway, we focused on TGF-ß1 for further analysis. On the protein level, a strong reduction of TGF-ß1 was observed in CAMA-1 Rab31 overexpressing cells compared to the vector control in both cell lysates and cell culture supernatants. Similar results were obtained with a second breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-231. These cells, however, showed a moderate reduction of TGF-ß1 upon Rab31 overexpression, probably due to the intrinsic Rab31 levels already present in the parental cells. In line with these observations, comparing cell lines with different endogenous Rab31 levels, the strongest effects of Rab31 overexpression on elevated proliferation were detected in breast cancer cell lines not showing any detectable Rab31 expression like CAMA-1 (Grismayer 2012). In addition, there may be differential regulatory effects of ER expression, since MUC1-C in complex with ERα activates Rab31 expression and, in turn, Rab31 increases MUC1-C levels in a positive feedback auto-inductive loop (Jin et al. 2012). This may potentiate the effect of Rab31 overexpression on TGF-ß1 reduction in ER-positive CAMA-1 cells. Most importantly, our present results demonstrate that not only protein production but also activity of TGF-ß1 was considerably reduced as shown by our highly sensitive cell-based bioassay. To complement our findings, future work should evaluate the impact of Rab31 overexpression in tumor cells on TGFβ1-related signaling pathways, including both SMAD-dependent and non-canonical signaling cascades e.g., Erk, JNK/p38 MAPK, small GTPase and PI3K/Akt.

TGF-ß signaling is an important pathway in cancer progression, which mediates both tumor-suppressive and pro-oncogenic effects (Meulmeester and Ten Dijke 2011; Syed 2016; Wakefield and Roberts 2002; Zu et al. 2012). The earliest event described in TGF-ß-induced EMT is the activation of a regulatory enzyme of the Ras family, namely RhoA (Tavares et al. 2006; Yang and Weinberg 2008). Moreover, TGF-ß induces EMT in co-operation with Ras GTPase signaling, which leads to a more invasive phenotype in response to stimulation by growth factors (Oft et al. 2002; Ungefroren et al. 2018). During EMT, cells elongate and secrete proteases, which degrade the extracellular matrix facilitating their invasion. Cancer cells can form actin-rich adhesion structures, so-called invadopodia, and, by this, are able to alter the tumor microenvironment. TGF-ß stimulates invadopodia formation in numerous cancer cells (Augoff et al. 2020). In vivo, tumor cells use invadopodia-like structures for intravasation by polarized secretion of proteases (Eddy et al. 2017). Strikingly, in these processes, Rab-GTPases, e.g. Rab7, Rab5a and Rab4, are involved via regulation of the vesicular transport (Alli-Balogun et al. 2016; Frittoli et al. 2014; Monteiro et al. 2013). Noll and co-workers (2019) even showed that Rab4 downregulation inhibited the matrix degradation of TGF-ß-treated breast cancer cells. Rab proteins take also part in internalization and recycling of the TGF-ß receptor via vesicle transport, which provides a means to regulate the number of surface receptors (Porther and Barbieri 2015).

We previously showed that Rab31 overexpression attenuates invasion and enhances proliferation of breast cancer cells through inhibition of the EMT-like phenotype and the switch to the more proliferative MET-like phenotype (Grismayer et al. 2012). This suggests that the observed drop of TGF-ß in these cells may be critical in this process. In order to further elucidate the Rab31 effects on the TGF-ß signaling pathway, we extended our search for differentially regulated genes in Rab31 overexpressing versus control cells and performed a profiler PCR array with a focus on genes of the TGF-ß superfamily. In addition to TGFB1, several other candidate genes including TGFB2, BMP7 and SMAD-6, were identified and subsequently validated to be selectively up- or downregulated upon cellular Rab31 overexpression. Our findings indicate that Rab31, depending on its expression level, has a crucial impact on the expression of various components of the TGF-ß signaling pathway in breast cancer cells.

Most of our identified differentially expressed genes, including TGFB1, display "chameleon-like" activity, i.e., the encoded proteins can exert opposite effects in different settings, e.g., different cell lines or tumor samples. This so-called antagonistic duality of cancer genes certainly depends on the genetic context and the tumor microenvironment, which lead to (in)activation of signaling pathways within a complex network and to the seemingly paradox, opposite responses to the same protein (Stepanenko et al. 2013). In our future studies, we will investigate the relation between the expression patterns of the various identified factors and phenotypic changes mediated by the modulation of Rab31 levels.

TGFβ1 and EMT are key regulators of tumor cell migration, invasion, and metastasis (Pang et al. 2016; Chen et al. 2017). However, TGFβ1 also exerts well-described tumor suppressive functions (cytostasis, differentiation, apoptosis, suppression of inflammation and stroma-derived mitogens) in early stages (Massague 2008, Cantelli et al. 2017). Overexpression of Rab31 in breast cancer cells, resulting in downregulation of TGF-ß, may lead to a deregulation of the balance between cell cycle arrest and cell proliferation in favor of tumor growth. A study by Agajanian and co-workers (2015) showed that the Src-regulator PEAK1 mediates the shift of TGF-ß responses from an anti-proliferative to pro-tumorigenic function, highlighting the importance of signaling pathway crosstalk during cancer progression. Hence, cancer cells must initially find a way to escape growth inhibition and cell death regulated by the TGF-ß pathway. One possible mechanism is the truncation of the pathway via receptor-inactivating mutations and, consequently, silencing of TGF-ß signaling. Another mechanism may be to selectively tune down the tumor-suppressive arm of the pathway either by mutations within the cascade or by inhibition caused by other signaling cascades (Bierie and Moses 2009; Ikushima and Miyazono 2010; Massagué 2008; Morrison et al. 2013). Repression of TGF-ß by Rab31 overexpression may be part of the later mechanism to dampen the tumor-suppressing activities of the TGF-ß pathway. During invasion and metastasis, Rab31-triggered downregulation of TGF-ß may be lost, since, e.g., elevated levels of TGF-β—leading to an EMT-like phenotype of the cancer cells—have been found at invasive fronts in human breast cancer tissues (reviewed in Morrison et al. 2013). All in all, it seems reasonable that elevated Rab31 levels mediate anti-EMT-like activities which promote initial primary tumor growth as well as re-establishment of metastases at a distant site. This may well explain also the clinical finding that elevated Rab31 levels, determined in primary tumor tissue, are associated with poor patient prognosis.

Conclusions

In the present study, we demonstrate that Rab31 is a potent modulator of the expression of TGF-ß and other components of the TGF-ß signaling pathway in breast cancer cells. Its impact on TGF-ß expression in the primary tumor or in the distant metastases resulting in tumor growth may explain why high Rab31 levels in tumor tissue are related to poor patient prognosis.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Abbreviations

BSA:

Bovine serum albumin

BMP:

Bone morphogenetic proteins

CLSM:

Confocal laser scanning microscopy

DMEM:

Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium

ELISA:

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

EMT:

Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition

ER:

Estrogen receptor

FCS:

Fetal calf serum

GDP:

Guanosine diphosphate

GTP:

Guanosine triphosphate

HPRT:

Hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyl transferase 1

LAP:

Latent-associated protein

MET:

Mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition

MUC1-C:

Mucin-1

PBS:

Phospate-buffered saline

PCR:

Polymerase chain reaction

qPCR:

Quantitative PCR

Rab:

Ras-related protein in brain

RT:

Room temperature

SEAP:

Secreted alkaline phosphatase

TBS:

Tris-buffered saline

TBS-T:

TBS containing 0.1% (v/v) Tween-20

TGF-ß:

Transforming growth factor-ß

TMB:

3,3’,5,5’-Tetramethylbenzidine

References

  1. Agajanian M, Campeau A, Hoover M, Hou A, Brambilla D, Kim SL, Klemke RL, Kelber JA. PEAK1 acts as a molecular switch to regulate context-dependent TGFβ responses in breast cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0135748.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Alli-Balogun GO, Gewinner CA, Jacobs R, Kriston-Vizi J, Waugh MG, Minogue S. Phosphatidylinositol 4-kinase IIβ negatively regulates invadopodia formation and suppresses an invasive cellular phenotype. Mol Biol Cell. 2016;27:4033–42.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Augoff K, Hryniewicz-Jankowska A, Tabola R. Invadopodia: clearing the way for cancer cell invasion. Ann Transl Med. 2020;8:902.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Bao X, Faris AE, Jang EK, Haslam RJ. Molecular cloning, bacterial expression and properties of Rab31 and Rab32. Eur J Biochem. 2002;269:259–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barsotti MC, Losi P, Briganti E, Sanguinetti E, Magera A, Al Kayal T, Feriani R, Di Stefano R, Soldani G. Effect of platelet lysate on human cells involved in different phases of wound healing. PLoS One. 2013;8:e84753.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Beaufort N, Scharrer E, Kremmer E, Lux V, Ehrmann M, Huber R, Houlden H, Werring D, Haffner C, Dichgans M. Cerebral small vessel disease-related protease HtrA1 processes latent TGF-β binding protein 1 and facilitates TGF-β signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:16496–501.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bierie B, Moses HL. Gain or loss of TGFbeta signaling in mammary carcinoma cells can promote metastasis. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:3319–27.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Broekelmann TJ, Bodmer NK, Mecham RP. Identification of the growth factor-binding sequence in the extracellular matrix protein MAGP-1. J Biol Chem. 2020;295:2687–97.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Cantelli G, Crosas-Molist E, Georgouli M, Sanz-Moreno V. TGFΒ-induced transcription in cancer. Semin Cancer Biol. 2017;42:60–9.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Q, Yang W, Wang X, Li X, Qi S, Zhang Y, Gao MQ. TGF-β1 induces EMT in bovine mammary epithelial cells through the TGFβ1/Smad signaling pathway. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2017;43:82–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cheng KW, Lahad JP, Gray JW, Mills GB. Emerging role of RAB GTPases in cancer and human disease. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2516–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Chia WJ, Tang BL. Emerging roles for Rab family GTPases in human cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1795:110–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chua CE, Tang BL. The role of the small GTPase Rab31 in cancer. J Cell Mol Med. 2015;19:1–10.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eddy RJ, Weidmann MD, Sharma VP, Condeelis JS. Tumor cell invadopodia: invasive protrusions that orchestrate metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2017;27:595–607.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ehrbar M, Rizzi SC, Hlushchuk R, Djonov V, Zisch AH, Hubbell JA, Weber FE, Lutolf MP. Enzymatic formation of modular cell-instructive fibrin analogs for tissue engineering. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3856–66.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Frittoli E, Palamidessi A, Marighetti P, Confalonieri S, Bianchi F, Malinverno C, Mazzarol G, Viale G, Martin-Padura I, Garré M, Parazzoli D, Mattei V, Cortellino S, Bertalot G, Di Fiore PP, Scita G. A RAB5/RAB4 recycling circuitry induces a proteolytic invasive program and promotes tumor dissemination. J Cell Biol. 2014;206:307–28.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Goud B, Gleeson PA. TGN golgins, Rabs and cytoskeleton: regulating the Golgi trafficking highways. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:329–36.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grismayer B, Soelch S, Seubert B, Kirchner T, Schaefer S, Baretton G, Schmitt M, Luther T, Krueger A, Kotzsch M, Magdolen V. Rab31 expression levels modulate tumor-relevant characteristics of breast cancer cells. Mol Cancer. 2012;11:62.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Homma Y, Hiragi S, Fukuda M. Rab family of small GTPases: an updated view on their regulation and functions. FEBS J. 2020 (Epub ahead of print)

  20. Hutmacher DW, Loessner D, Rizzi S, Kaplan DL, Mooney DJ, Clements JA. Can tissue engineering concepts advance tumor biology research? Trends Biotechnol. 2010;28:125–33.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ikushima H, Miyazono K. TGFbeta signalling: a complex web in cancer progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10:415–24.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jin C, Rajabi H, Pitroda S, Li A, Kharbanda A, Weichselbaum R, Kufe D. Cooperative interaction between the MUC1-C oncoprotein and the Rab31 GTPase in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer cells. PLoS One. 2012;7:e39432.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Johnston CJC, Smyth DJ, Kodali RB, White MPJ, Harcus Y, Filbey KJ, Hewitson JP, Hinck CS, Ivens A, Kemter AM, Kildemoes AO, Le Bihan T, Soares DC, Anderton SM, Brenn T, Wigmore SJ, Woodcock HV, Chambers RC, Hinck AP, McSorley HJ, Maizels RM. A structurally distinct TGF-β mimic from an intestinal helminth parasite potently induces regulatory T cells. Nat Commun. 2017;8:1741.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kardassis D, Murphy C, Fotsis T, Moustakas A, Stournaras C. Control of transforming growth factor beta signal transduction by small GTPases. FEBS J. 2009;276:2947–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kloepper TH, Kienle N, Fasshauer D, Munro S. Untangling the evolution of Rab G proteins: implications of a comprehensive genomic analysis. BMC Biol. 2012;10:71.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kotzsch M, Sieuwerts AM, Grosser M, Meye A, Fuessel S, Meijer-van Gelder ME, Smid M, Schmitt M, Baretton G, Luther T, Magdolen V, Foekens JA. Urokinase receptor splice variant uPAR-del4/5-associated gene expression in breast cancer: identification of Rab31 as an independent prognostic factor. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;111:229–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kotzsch M, Goettig P, Soelch S, Magdolen V. Rab31 (Ras-related protein in brain 31). Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol. 2016;20:481–90.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kotzsch M, Kirchner T, Soelch S, Schaefer S, Friedrich K, Baretton G, Magdolen V, Luther T. Inverse association of Rab31 and mucin-1 (CA15-3) antigen levels in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer tissues with clinicopathological parameters and patients’ prognosis. Am J Cancer Res. 2017;7:1959–70.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Krishnan PDG, Golden E, Woodward EA, Pavlos NJ, Blancafort P. Rab GTPases: emerging oncogenes and tumor suppressive regulators for the editing of survival pathways in cancer. Cancers. 2020;12:259.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Loessner D, Meinert C, Kaemmerer E, Martine LC, Yue K, Levett PA, Klein TJ, Melchels FP, Khademhosseini A, Hutmacher DW. Functionalization, preparation and use of cell-laden gelatin methacryloyl-based hydrogels as modular tissue culture platforms. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:727–46.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Manokawinchoke J, Pavasant P, Sawangmake C, Limjeerajarus N, Limjeerajarus CN, Egusa H, Osathanon T. Intermittent compressive force promotes osteogenic differentiation in human periodontal ligament cells by regulating the transforming growth factor-β pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:761.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Massagué J. TGFbeta in Cancer. Cell. 2008;134:215–30.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Meulmeester E, Ten Dijke P. The dynamic roles of TGF-β in cancer. J Pathol. 2011;223:205–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mitra S, Cheng KW, Mills GB. Rab GTPases implicated in inherited and acquired disorders. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2011;22:57–68.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Monteiro P, Rossé C, Castro-Castro A, Irondelle M, Lagoutte E, Paul-Gilloteaux P, Desnos C, Formstecher E, Darchen F, Perrais D, Gautreau A, Hertzog M, Chavrier P. Endosomal WASH and exocyst complexes control exocytosis of MT1-MMP at invadopodia. J Cell Biol. 2013;203:1063–79.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Morrison CD, Parvani JG, Schiemann WP. The relevance of the TGF-β Paradox to EMT-MET programs. Cancer Lett. 2013;341:30–40.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ng EL, Wang Y, Tang BL. Rab22B’s role in trans-Golgi network membrane dynamics. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2007;361:751–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Noll B, Benz D, Frey Y, Meyer F, Lauinger M, Eisler SA, Schmid S, Hordijk PL, Olayioye MA. DLC3 suppresses MT1-MMP-dependent matrix degradation by controlling RhoB and actin remodeling at endosomal membranes. J Cell Sci. 2019;132:jcs223172.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Oft M, Akhurst RJ, Balmain A. Metastasis is driven by sequential elevation of H-ras and Smad2 levels. Nat Cell Biol. 2002;4:487–94.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Pan Y, Zhang Y, Chen L, Liu Y, Feng Y, Yan J. The critical role of Rab31 in cell proliferation and apoptosis in cancer progression. Mol Neurobiol. 2016;53:4431–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Pang MF, Georgoudaki AM, Lambut L, Johansson J, Tabor V, Hagikura K, Jin Y, Jansson M, Alexander JS, Nelson CM, Jakobsson L, Betsholtz C, Sund M, Karlsson MC, Fuxe J. TGF-β1-induced EMT promotes targeted migration of breast cancer cells through the lymphatic system by the activation of CCR7/CCL21-mediated chemotaxis. Oncogene. 2016;35:748–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Panopoulou E, Gillooly DJ, Wrana JL, Zerial M, Stenmark H, Murphy C, Fotsis T. Early endosomal regulation of Smad-dependent signaling in endothelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:18046–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Porther N, Barbieri MA. The role of endocytic Rab GTPases in regulation of growth factor signaling and the migration and invasion of tumor cells. Small GTPases. 2015;6:135–44.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Pylypenko O, Hammich H, Yu IM, Houdusse A. Rab GTPases and their interacting protein partners: Structural insights into Rab functional diversity. Small GTPases. 2018;9:22–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Ribatti D, Tamma R, Annese T. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cancer: a historical overview. Transl Oncol. 2020;13:100773.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Rodriguez-Gabin AG, Cammer M, Almazan G, Charron M, Larocca JN. Role of rRAB22b, an oligodendrocyte protein, in regulation of transport of vesicles from trans Golgi to endocytic compartments. J Neurosci Res. 2001;66:1149–60.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Rodriguez-Gabin AG, Yin X, Si Q, Larocca JN. Transport of mannose-6-phosphate receptors from the trans-Golgi network to endosomes requires Rab31. Exp Cell Res. 2009;315:2215–30.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Schmidt A, Göpfert C, Vlodavsky I, Völker W, Buddecke E. Induction of a hypertrophic growth status of coronary smooth muscle cells is associated with an overexpression of TGF-beta. Eur J Cell Biol. 2002;81:138–44.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Singan VR, Handzic K, Simpson JC. Quantitative image analysis approaches for probing Rab GTPase localization and function in mammalian cells. Biochem Soc Trans. 2012;40:1389–93.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Stenmark H. Rab GTPases as coordinators of vesicle traffic. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2009;10:513–25.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Stepanenko AA, Vassetzky YS, Kavsan VM. Antagonistic functional duality of cancer genes. Gene. 2013;529:199–207.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Syed V. TGF-β signaling in cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2016;117:1279–87.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Tang CT, Liang Q, Yang L, Lin XL, Wu S, Chen Y, Zhang XT, Gao YJ, Ge ZZ. RAB31 targeted by miR-30c-2-3p regulates the GLI1 signaling pathway, affecting gastric cancer cell proliferation and apoptosis. Front Oncol. 2018;8:554.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. Tavares AL, Mercado-Pimentel ME, Runyan RB, Kitten GT. TGF beta-mediated RhoA expression is necessary for epithelial-mesenchymal transition in the embryonic chick heart. Dev Dyn. 2006;235:1589–98.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tesseur I, Zou K, Berber E, Zhang H, Wyss-Coray T. Highly sensitive and specific bioassay for measuring bioactive TGF-beta. BMC Cell Biol. 2006;7:15.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  56. Thiery JP. Metastasis: alone or together? Curr Biol. 2009;19:R1121–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Tzeng HT, Wang YC. Rab-mediated vesicle trafficking in cancer. J Biomed Sci. 2016;23:70.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  58. Ungefroren H, Witte D, Lehnert H. The role of small GTPases of the Rho/Rac family in TGF-β-induced EMT and cell motility in cancer. Dev Dyn. 2018;247:451–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Wakefield LM, Roberts AB. TGF-beta signaling: positive and negative effects on tumorigenesis. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2002;12:22–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Yang J, Weinberg RA. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition: at the crossroads of development and tumor metastasis. Dev Cell. 2008;14:818–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Yang J, Liu W, Lu X, Fu Y, Li L, Luo Y. High expression of small GTPase Rab3D promotes cancer progression and metastasis. Oncotarget. 2015;6:11125–38.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  62. Yang J, Antin P, Berx G, Blanpain C, Brabletz T, Bronner M, Sheng G, EMT International Association (TEMTIA), et al. Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21:341–52.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Yu Q, Li D, Wang D, Hu CM, Sun Y, Tang Y, Shi G. Effect of RAB31 silencing on osteosarcoma cell proliferation and migration through the Hedgehog signaling pathway. J Bone Miner Metab. 2019;37:594–606. Erratum in: J Bone Miner Metab. 38:742–3.

  64. Zhang J, Wei J, Lu J, Tong Z, Liao B, Yu B, Zheng F, Huang X, Chen Z, Fang Y, Li B, Chen W, Xie D, Luo J. Overexpression of Rab25 contributes to metastasis of bladder cancer through induction of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and activation of Akt/GSK-3β/Snail signaling. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:2401–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Zhen Y, Stenmark H. Cellular functions of Rab GTPases at a glance. J Cell Sci. 2015;128:3171–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Zu X, Zhang Q, Cao R, Liu J, Zhong J, Wen G, Cao D. Transforming growth factor-β signaling in tumor initiation, progression and therapy in breast cancer: an update. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;347:73–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank J. Foekens (Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands) and A. Krüger (Technical University of Munich, Germany) for fruitful discussions and continuous support of the Rab31 project as well as T. Wyss-Coray (Stanford University School of Medicine, USA) for providing MFB-F11 cells.

Funding

Open Access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL. S. Soelch was in part supported by a scholarship from the PhD program in Medical Life Science and Technology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Germany. Open Access funding enabled and organized by Project DEAL.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SS, UR, NB and DL performed the research; SS, NB, DL, TK, MK, TL and VM analyzed and interpreted the data; SS, NB, DL, UR, and TK reviewed and edited the manuscript; MK, TL and VM wrote the manuscript. TK and VM were responsible for conception and design of the project. VM was responsible for project administration and supervision of the project. All authors read and approved the final manuscript version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Viktor Magdolen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soelch, S., Beaufort, N., Loessner, D. et al. Rab31-dependent regulation of transforming growth factor ß expression in breast cancer cells. Mol Med 27, 158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-021-00419-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s10020-021-00419-8

Keywords

  • TGF-ß signaling
  • GTPase
  • Rab31
  • Breast cancer
  • EMT